From 4a8d9effcadc2670b0add531ddec15fc82ec0ce0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Landley
The downside of standard dynamic linking is that it results in self-modifying +code. Although each executable's pages are mmaped() into a process's address +space from the executable file and are thus naturally shared between processes +out of the page cache, the library loader (ld-linux.so.2 or ld-uClibc.so.0) +writes to these pages to supply addresses for relocatable symbols. This +dirties the pages, triggering copy-on-write allocation of new memory for each +processes's dirtied pages.
+ +One solution to this is Position Independent Code (PIC), a way of linking +a file so all the relocations are grouped together. This dirties fewer +pages (often just a single page) for each process's relocations. The down +side is this results in larger executables, which take up more space on disk +(and a correspondingly larger space in memory). But when many copies of the +same program are running, PIC dynamic linking trades a larger disk footprint +for a smaller memory footprint, by sharing more pages.
+ +A third solution is static linking. A statically linked program has no +relocations, and thus the entire executable is shared between all running +instances. This tends to have a significantly larger disk footprint, but +on a system with only one or two executables, shared libraries aren't much +of a win anyway.
+ +You can tell the glibc linker to display debugging information about its +relocations with the environment variable "LD_DEBUG". Try +"LD_DEBUG=help /bin/true" for a list of commands. Learning to interperet +"LD_DEBUG=statistics cat /proc/self/statm" could be interesting.
+The following login accounts currently exist on busybox.net. (I.E. these @@ -375,7 +405,6 @@ solar :Ned Ludd timr :Tim Riker tobiasa :Tobias Anderberg vapier :Mike Frysinger -vodz :Vladimir N. Oleynik
The following accounts used to exist on busybox.net, but don't anymore so @@ -395,6 +424,7 @@ miles proski rjune tausq +vodz :Vladimir N. Oleynik