From c13ea57495d8341a056bc7bb022d4cad917196cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Warner Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:24:57 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] library: added some justification emphasis, api I almost feel like I should apologize for this kind of patch ( *almost* ). But, since this comment was unique to the api and since it was especially designed to align with the following comment and since the next comment already carried the alignment emphasis, I will refrain from issuing any apology and submit it anyway. [ plus to prove that i am not totally anal-retentive ] [ and can exercise some restraint there are two more ] [ places where i COULD have added alignment emphasis ] [ see lines 804-806 and lines 1360-1361 for my proof ] Signed-off-by: Jim Warner --- proc/pids.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/proc/pids.c b/proc/pids.c index c05743d7..61fb5d17 100644 --- a/proc/pids.c +++ b/proc/pids.c @@ -1069,9 +1069,9 @@ static int pids_stacks_fetch ( if (!pids_assign_results(info, info->fetch.anchor[n_inuse++], &task)) return -1; // here, errno was set to ENOMEM } - /* while the possibility is extremely remote, the readproc.c (read_something) - simple_readproc and simple_readtask guys could have encountered this error - in which case they would have returned a NULL, thus ending our while loop. */ + /* while the possibility is extremely remote, the readproc.c (read_something) | + simple_readproc and simple_readtask guys could have encountered this error | + in which case they would have returned a NULL, thus ending our while loop. | */ if (errno == ENOMEM) return -1;