From 30c9e0a005b39ec33572fdc7ace16ad075810aed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 11:53:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [btree_damage_visitor_t] Store the btree path in the
 node_info rather than the level.

---
 unit-tests/btree_damage_visitor_t.cc | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/unit-tests/btree_damage_visitor_t.cc b/unit-tests/btree_damage_visitor_t.cc
index af2136b..e77c853 100644
--- a/unit-tests/btree_damage_visitor_t.cc
+++ b/unit-tests/btree_damage_visitor_t.cc
@@ -66,9 +66,10 @@ namespace {
 	struct node_info {
 		typedef boost::shared_ptr<node_info> ptr;
 
+		btree_detail::btree_path path;
+
 		bool leaf;
 		unsigned depth;
-		unsigned level;
 		block_address b;
 		range<uint64_t> keys;
 	};
@@ -198,9 +199,9 @@ namespace {
 		void record_node(bool leaf, node_location const &loc, N const &n) {
 			node_info::ptr ni(new node_info);
 
+			ni->path = loc.path;
 			ni->leaf = leaf;
 			ni->depth = loc.depth;
-			ni->level = loc.level();
 			ni->b = n.get_location();
 
 			if (n.get_nr_entries())