video_core/command_processor: correctly handles 0xFFFF index as a normal index
This commit is contained in:
parent
7bffd7c1b0
commit
08a38370b0
@ -323,12 +323,12 @@ static void WritePicaReg(u32 id, u32 value, u32 mask) {
|
||||
// Simple circular-replacement vertex cache
|
||||
// The size has been tuned for optimal balance between hit-rate and the cost of lookup
|
||||
const size_t VERTEX_CACHE_SIZE = 32;
|
||||
std::array<bool, VERTEX_CACHE_SIZE> vertex_cache_valid{};
|
||||
std::array<u16, VERTEX_CACHE_SIZE> vertex_cache_ids;
|
||||
std::array<Shader::AttributeBuffer, VERTEX_CACHE_SIZE> vertex_cache;
|
||||
Shader::AttributeBuffer vs_output;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int vertex_cache_pos = 0;
|
||||
vertex_cache_ids.fill(-1);
|
||||
|
||||
auto* shader_engine = Shader::GetEngine();
|
||||
Shader::UnitState shader_unit;
|
||||
@ -346,10 +346,6 @@ static void WritePicaReg(u32 id, u32 value, u32 mask) {
|
||||
is_indexed ? (index_u16 ? index_address_16[index] : index_address_8[index])
|
||||
: (index + regs.pipeline.vertex_offset);
|
||||
|
||||
// -1 is a common special value used for primitive restart. Since it's unknown if
|
||||
// the PICA supports it, and it would mess up the caching, guard against it here.
|
||||
ASSERT(vertex != -1);
|
||||
|
||||
bool vertex_cache_hit = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_indexed) {
|
||||
@ -365,7 +361,7 @@ static void WritePicaReg(u32 id, u32 value, u32 mask) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < VERTEX_CACHE_SIZE; ++i) {
|
||||
if (vertex == vertex_cache_ids[i]) {
|
||||
if (vertex_cache_valid[i] && vertex == vertex_cache_ids[i]) {
|
||||
vs_output = vertex_cache[i];
|
||||
vertex_cache_hit = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -388,6 +384,7 @@ static void WritePicaReg(u32 id, u32 value, u32 mask) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_indexed) {
|
||||
vertex_cache[vertex_cache_pos] = vs_output;
|
||||
vertex_cache_valid[vertex_cache_pos] = true;
|
||||
vertex_cache_ids[vertex_cache_pos] = vertex;
|
||||
vertex_cache_pos = (vertex_cache_pos + 1) % VERTEX_CACHE_SIZE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user