emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
6fafa5aa9f
busybox/procps/Makefile.in

44 lines
1.4 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Completely rework the config system so that it no longer annoys me to work on the busybox development tree. This eliminates the use of recursive make, and once again allows us to run 'make' in a subdirectory with the expected result. And things are now much faster too. Greatly improved IMHO... -Erik
2002-04-12 17:35:57 +05:30
# Makefile for busybox
#
Remove trailing whitespace. Update copyright to include 2004.
2004-03-15 13:59:22 +05:30
# Copyright (C) 1999-2004 by Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
Completely rework the config system so that it no longer annoys me to work on the busybox development tree. This eliminates the use of recursive make, and once again allows us to run 'make' in a subdirectory with the expected result. And things are now much faster too. Greatly improved IMHO... -Erik
2002-04-12 17:35:57 +05:30
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
# General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
#
PROCPS_AR:=procps.a
ifndef $(PROCPS_DIR)
egor duda writes: Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor
2004-10-08 13:16:08 +05:30
PROCPS_DIR:=$(top_builddir)/procps/
Completely rework the config system so that it no longer annoys me to work on the busybox development tree. This eliminates the use of recursive make, and once again allows us to run 'make' in a subdirectory with the expected result. And things are now much faster too. Greatly improved IMHO... -Erik
2002-04-12 17:35:57 +05:30
endif
egor duda writes: Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor
2004-10-08 13:16:08 +05:30
srcdir=$(top_srcdir)/procps
Completely rework the config system so that it no longer annoys me to work on the busybox development tree. This eliminates the use of recursive make, and once again allows us to run 'make' in a subdirectory with the expected result. And things are now much faster too. Greatly improved IMHO... -Erik
2002-04-12 17:35:57 +05:30
Bugfix from Claudio Fleiner <claudio@fleiner.com>
2002-10-01 02:23:38 +05:30
PROCPS-y:=
Completely rework the config system so that it no longer annoys me to work on the busybox development tree. This eliminates the use of recursive make, and once again allows us to run 'make' in a subdirectory with the expected result. And things are now much faster too. Greatly improved IMHO... -Erik
2002-04-12 17:35:57 +05:30
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_FREE) += free.o
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_KILL) += kill.o
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_PIDOF) += pidof.o
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_PS) += ps.o
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_RENICE) += renice.o
Patch from Ned Ludd, solar at gentoo dot org: I had previously provided you with a patch to help complete busybox's props suite, but have heard no word back. Sense then I've made use of as many of busybox's native API settings as I could find and would really love for you to include support for this. If there is something more I need to do to get this supported added in please let me know.
2003-12-24 11:32:11 +05:30
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl.o
Add a new top applet -Erik
2002-09-18 03:44:58 +05:30
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_TOP) += top.o
Completely rework the config system so that it no longer annoys me to work on the busybox development tree. This eliminates the use of recursive make, and once again allows us to run 'make' in a subdirectory with the expected result. And things are now much faster too. Greatly improved IMHO... -Erik
2002-04-12 17:35:57 +05:30
PROCPS-$(CONFIG_UPTIME) += uptime.o
libraries-y+=$(PROCPS_DIR)$(PROCPS_AR)
$(PROCPS_DIR)$(PROCPS_AR): $(patsubst %,$(PROCPS_DIR)%, $(PROCPS-y))
$(AR) -ro $@ $(patsubst %,$(PROCPS_DIR)%, $(PROCPS-y))
egor duda writes: Hi! I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6. That is, one runs command like 'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options' and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists. I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing is needed at all to whether it coded properly. 'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that. One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first. egor
2004-10-08 13:16:08 +05:30
$(PROCPS_DIR)%.o: $(srcdir)/%.c
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $<
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink