Patch from Steven Scholz:

should we rename the define into CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_DMA and
use it for "set" and "get" ???

Since although CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GET_DMA is _not_ set I still
can use "hdparm -d 1 /dev/hda" to switch the DMA on.
Is this desireable or meant to be like that?

So how about the applied patch?
This commit is contained in:
Eric Andersen
2003-08-06 08:57:35 +00:00
parent 4b4e09854c
commit 0a57a79e38
3 changed files with 20 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -1820,6 +1820,7 @@ static void process_dev (char *devname)
if (ioctl(fd, HDIO_SET_UNMASKINTR, unmask))
bb_perror_msg(" HDIO_SET_UNMASKINTR failed");
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GETSET_DMA
if (set_dma) {
no_scsi();
if (get_dma) {
@@ -1829,6 +1830,7 @@ static void process_dev (char *devname)
if (ioctl(fd, HDIO_SET_DMA, dma))
bb_perror_msg(" HDIO_SET_DMA failed");
}
#endif /* CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GETSET_DMA */
if (set_dma_q) {
no_scsi();
if (get_dma_q) {
@@ -2080,7 +2082,7 @@ static void process_dev (char *devname)
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GET_DMA
#ifdef CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GETSET_DMA
if ((verbose && !is_scsi_hd) || get_dma) {
no_scsi();
if (ioctl(fd, HDIO_GET_DMA, &parm))
@@ -2382,6 +2384,7 @@ int hdparm_main(int argc, char **argv)
unmask = *p++ - '0';
}
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GETSET_DMA
case 'd':
get_dma = noisy;
noisy = 1;
@@ -2392,6 +2395,7 @@ int hdparm_main(int argc, char **argv)
dma = *p++ - '0';
}
break;
#endif /* CONFIG_FEATURE_HDPARM_HDIO_GETSET_DMA */
case 'n':
get_nowerr = noisy;
noisy = 1;