runsv: robustify signal handling - SIGTERM to child between vfork and exec could mess things up
While at it, rename bb_signals_recursive_norestart() to bb_signals_norestart(): "recursive" was implying we are setting SA_NODEFER allowing signal handler to be entered recursively, but we do not do that. function old new delta bb_signals_norestart - 70 +70 startservice 380 394 +14 bb_signals_recursive_norestart 70 - -70 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 84/-70) Total: 14 bytes Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -149,11 +149,15 @@ static void warn_cannot(const char *m)
|
||||
warn2_cannot(m, "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* SIGCHLD/TERM handlers are reentrancy-safe because they are unmasked
|
||||
* only over poll() call, not over memory allocations
|
||||
* or printouts. Do not need to save/restore errno either,
|
||||
* as poll() error is not checked there.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void s_child(int sig_no UNUSED_PARAM)
|
||||
{
|
||||
write(selfpipe.wr, "", 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void s_term(int sig_no UNUSED_PARAM)
|
||||
{
|
||||
sigterm = 1;
|
||||
@@ -380,14 +384,14 @@ static void startservice(struct svdir *s)
|
||||
xdup2(logpipe.wr, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway.
|
||||
* But we can get signals BEFORE execl(), this is unlikely
|
||||
* but wouldn't be good...
|
||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec.
|
||||
* But we can get signals BEFORE execl(), unlikely as that may be.
|
||||
* SIGCHLD is safe (would merely write to selfpipe),
|
||||
* but SIGTERM would set sigterm = 1 (with vfork, we affect parent).
|
||||
* Avoid that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/*bb_signals(0
|
||||
+ (1 << SIGCHLD)
|
||||
+ (1 << SIGTERM)
|
||||
, SIG_DFL);*/
|
||||
/*signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);*/
|
||||
signal(SIGTERM, SIG_DFL);
|
||||
sig_unblock(SIGCHLD);
|
||||
sig_unblock(SIGTERM);
|
||||
execv(arg[0], (char**) arg);
|
||||
@@ -514,9 +518,13 @@ int runsv_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
||||
ndelay_on(selfpipe.wr);
|
||||
|
||||
sig_block(SIGCHLD);
|
||||
bb_signals_recursive_norestart(1 << SIGCHLD, s_child);
|
||||
sig_block(SIGTERM);
|
||||
bb_signals_recursive_norestart(1 << SIGTERM, s_term);
|
||||
/* No particular reason why we don't set SA_RESTART
|
||||
* (poll() wouldn't restart regardless of that flag),
|
||||
* we just follow what runit-2.1.2 does:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bb_signals_norestart(1 << SIGCHLD, s_child);
|
||||
bb_signals_norestart(1 << SIGTERM, s_term);
|
||||
|
||||
xchdir(dir);
|
||||
/* bss: svd[0].pid = 0; */
|
||||
@@ -628,6 +636,7 @@ int runsv_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
||||
sig_unblock(SIGTERM);
|
||||
sig_unblock(SIGCHLD);
|
||||
poll(x, 2 + haslog, 3600*1000);
|
||||
/* NB: signal handlers can trash errno of poll() */
|
||||
sig_block(SIGTERM);
|
||||
sig_block(SIGCHLD);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -1111,10 +1111,10 @@ int svlogd_main(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
sigaddset(&blocked_sigset, SIGALRM);
|
||||
sigaddset(&blocked_sigset, SIGHUP);
|
||||
sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &blocked_sigset, NULL);
|
||||
bb_signals_recursive_norestart(1 << SIGTERM, sig_term_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_recursive_norestart(1 << SIGCHLD, sig_child_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_recursive_norestart(1 << SIGALRM, sig_alarm_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_recursive_norestart(1 << SIGHUP, sig_hangup_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_norestart(1 << SIGTERM, sig_term_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_norestart(1 << SIGCHLD, sig_child_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_norestart(1 << SIGALRM, sig_alarm_handler);
|
||||
bb_signals_norestart(1 << SIGHUP, sig_hangup_handler);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Without timestamps, we don't have to print each line
|
||||
* separately, so we can look for _last_ newline, not first,
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user