emo/busybox
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test: fix 4-argument case

Browse Source 
Upstream dash commit:

    Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:20:10 +0800
    Fixed 3,4-argument cases for test per POSIX

    ----- Forwarded message from Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> -----

    Subject: Bug#455828: dash: 4-argument test "test \( ! -e \)" yields an error
    Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:53:29 +0000
    From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
    To: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>, 455828@bugs.debian.org

    On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
    > On 2007-12-27 16:00:06 +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
    > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:18:47AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
    > > > According to POSIX[*], "test \( ! -e \)" is a 4-argument test and is
    > > > here equivalent to "test ! -e". But dash (like ksh93 and bash) yields
    > > > an error:
    > > >
    > > > $ test \( ! -e \) || echo $?
    > > > test: 1: closing paren expected
    > > > 2
    > > > $ test ! -e || echo $?
    > > > 1
    > >
    > > Hi Vincent,
    > >
    > > the -e switch to test takes an argument, a pathname.
    >
    > According to POSIX, in both above examples, "-e" is *not* a switch,
    > just a string.
    >
    >   test \( ! -e \)
    >
    > means: return true if the string "-e" is empty, otherwhise return false.
    > The error in dash is that it incorrectly thinks that "-e" is a switch in
    > this context.

    I see, you're right.  Thanks, Gerrit.

    ----- End forwarded message -----

    This patch hard-codes the 3,4-argument cases in the way required by
    POSIX.

    Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>

function                                             old     new   delta
test_main                                            370     421     +51

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Denys Vlasenko
2017-07-31 19:20:43 +02:00
parent cee603d921
commit 78b1b1b07a
1 changed files with 39 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

48
coreutils/test.c
View File

@@ -879,18 +879,48 @@ int test_main(int argc, char **argv)
res = (argv[0][0] == '\0');
goto ret_special;
}
if (argv[2] && !argv[3]) {
check_operator(argv[1]);
if (last_operator->op_type == BINOP) {
/* "test [!] arg1 <binary_op> arg2" */
args = argv;
res = (binop() == 0);
if (argv[2]) {
if (!argv[3]) {
/*
* http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/test.html
* """ 3 arguments:
* If $2 is a binary primary, perform the binary test of $1 and $3.
* """
*/
check_operator(argv[1]);
if (last_operator->op_type == BINOP) {
/* "test [!] arg1 <binary_op> arg2" */
args = argv;
res = (binop() == 0);
ret_special:
/* If there was leading "!" op... */
res ^= negate;
goto ret;
/* If there was leading "!" op... */
res ^= negate;
goto ret;
}
/* """If $1 is '(' and $3 is ')', perform the unary test of $2."""
* Looks like this works without additional coding.
*/
goto check_negate;
}
/* argv[3] exists (at least 4 args), is it exactly 4 args? */
if (!argv[4]) {
/*
* """ 4 arguments:
* If $1 is '!', negate the three-argument test of $2, $3, and $4.
* If $1 is '(' and $4 is ')', perform the two-argument test of $2 and $3.
* """
* Example why code below is necessary: test '(' ! -e ')'
*/
if (LONE_CHAR(argv[0], '(')
&& LONE_CHAR(argv[3], ')')
) {
/* "test [!] ( x y )" */
argv[3] = NULL;
argv++;
}
}
}
check_negate:
if (LONE_CHAR(argv[0], '!')) {
argv++;
negate ^= 1;