tentatively fix getopt state corruption for NOFORK applets
This commit is contained in:
parent
f470196a41
commit
c4e4be9414
@ -131,12 +131,34 @@ int run_nofork_applet_prime(struct nofork_save_area *old, int applet_no, char **
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
applet_name = APPLET_NAME(applet_no);
|
applet_name = APPLET_NAME(applet_no);
|
||||||
xfunc_error_retval = EXIT_FAILURE;
|
xfunc_error_retval = EXIT_FAILURE;
|
||||||
/*option_mask32 = 0; - not needed */
|
|
||||||
/* special flag for xfunc_die(). If xfunc will "die"
|
/* Special flag for xfunc_die(). If xfunc will "die"
|
||||||
* in NOFORK applet, xfunc_die() sees negative
|
* in NOFORK applet, xfunc_die() sees negative
|
||||||
* die_sleep and longjmp here instead. */
|
* die_sleep and longjmp here instead. */
|
||||||
die_sleep = -1;
|
die_sleep = -1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* Reset the libc getopt() function, which keeps internal state.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* BSD-derived getopt() functions require that optind be reset to 1 in
|
||||||
|
* order to reset getopt() state. This used to be generally accepted
|
||||||
|
* way of resetting getopt(). However, glibc's getopt()
|
||||||
|
* has additional getopt() state beyond optind, and requires that
|
||||||
|
* optind be set zero to reset its state. So the unfortunate state of
|
||||||
|
* affairs is that BSD-derived versions of getopt() misbehave if
|
||||||
|
* optind is set to 0 in order to reset getopt(), and glibc's getopt()
|
||||||
|
* will core ump if optind is set 1 in order to reset getopt().
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* More modern versions of BSD require that optreset be set to 1 in
|
||||||
|
* order to reset getopt(). Sigh. Standards, anyone?
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
#ifdef __GLIBC__
|
||||||
|
optind = 0;
|
||||||
|
#else /* BSD style */
|
||||||
|
optind = 1;
|
||||||
|
/* optreset = 1; */
|
||||||
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
/* option_mask32 = 0; - not needed */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
argc = 1;
|
argc = 1;
|
||||||
while (argv[argc])
|
while (argv[argc])
|
||||||
argc++;
|
argc++;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user