tcp/udpsvd: robustify SIGCHLD handling
function old new delta if_verbose_print_connection_status - 40 +40 tcpudpsvd_main 1798 1794 -4 connection_status 31 - -31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 40/-35) Total: 5 bytes Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac444861b0
commit
d3e1090308
@ -216,17 +216,25 @@ enum {
|
|||||||
OPT_K = (1 << 16),
|
OPT_K = (1 << 16),
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void connection_status(void)
|
static void if_verbose_print_connection_status(void)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
if (verbose) {
|
||||||
/* "only 1 client max" desn't need this */
|
/* "only 1 client max" desn't need this */
|
||||||
if (cmax > 1)
|
if (cmax > 1)
|
||||||
bb_error_msg("status %u/%u", cnum, cmax);
|
bb_error_msg("status %u/%u", cnum, cmax);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* SIGCHLD handler is reentrancy-safe because SIGCHLD is unmasked
|
||||||
|
* only over accept() or recvfrom() calls, not over memory allocations
|
||||||
|
* or printouts. Do need to save/restore errno in order not to mangle
|
||||||
|
* these syscalls' error code, if any.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
static void sig_child_handler(int sig UNUSED_PARAM)
|
static void sig_child_handler(int sig UNUSED_PARAM)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int wstat;
|
int wstat;
|
||||||
pid_t pid;
|
pid_t pid;
|
||||||
|
int sv_errno = errno;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
while ((pid = wait_any_nohang(&wstat)) > 0) {
|
while ((pid = wait_any_nohang(&wstat)) > 0) {
|
||||||
if (max_per_host)
|
if (max_per_host)
|
||||||
@ -236,8 +244,8 @@ static void sig_child_handler(int sig UNUSED_PARAM)
|
|||||||
if (verbose)
|
if (verbose)
|
||||||
print_waitstat(pid, wstat);
|
print_waitstat(pid, wstat);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (verbose)
|
if_verbose_print_connection_status();
|
||||||
connection_status();
|
errno = sv_errno;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc, char **argv) MAIN_EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE;
|
int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc, char **argv) MAIN_EXTERNALLY_VISIBLE;
|
||||||
@ -458,7 +466,7 @@ int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
|||||||
xconnect(0, &remote.u.sa, sa_len);
|
xconnect(0, &remote.u.sa, sa_len);
|
||||||
/* hole? at this point we have no wildcard udp socket...
|
/* hole? at this point we have no wildcard udp socket...
|
||||||
* can this cause clients to get "port unreachable" icmp?
|
* can this cause clients to get "port unreachable" icmp?
|
||||||
* Yup, time window is very small, but it exists (is it?) */
|
* Yup, time window is very small, but it exists (does it?) */
|
||||||
/* ..."open new socket", continued */
|
/* ..."open new socket", continued */
|
||||||
xbind(sock, &lsa->u.sa, sa_len);
|
xbind(sock, &lsa->u.sa, sa_len);
|
||||||
socket_want_pktinfo(sock);
|
socket_want_pktinfo(sock);
|
||||||
@ -491,8 +499,7 @@ int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
|||||||
if (pid != 0) {
|
if (pid != 0) {
|
||||||
/* Parent */
|
/* Parent */
|
||||||
cnum++;
|
cnum++;
|
||||||
if (verbose)
|
if_verbose_print_connection_status();
|
||||||
connection_status();
|
|
||||||
if (hccp)
|
if (hccp)
|
||||||
hccp->pid = pid;
|
hccp->pid = pid;
|
||||||
/* clean up changes done by vforked child */
|
/* clean up changes done by vforked child */
|
||||||
@ -586,8 +593,14 @@ int tcpudpsvd_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
xdup2(0, 1);
|
xdup2(0, 1);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* Restore signal handling for the to-be-execed process */
|
||||||
signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL); /* this one was SIG_IGNed */
|
signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL); /* this one was SIG_IGNed */
|
||||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway */
|
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway
|
||||||
|
* But we can get signals BEFORE execvp(), this is unlikely
|
||||||
|
* but it would invoke sig_child_handler(), which would
|
||||||
|
* check waitpid(WNOHANG), then print "status N/M" if verbose.
|
||||||
|
* I guess we can live with that possibility.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
/*signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);*/
|
/*signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_DFL);*/
|
||||||
sig_unblock(SIGCHLD);
|
sig_unblock(SIGCHLD);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -380,7 +380,10 @@ static void startservice(struct svdir *s)
|
|||||||
xdup2(logpipe.wr, 1);
|
xdup2(logpipe.wr, 1);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway */
|
/* Non-ignored signals revert to SIG_DFL on exec anyway.
|
||||||
|
* But we can get signals BEFORE execl(), this is unlikely
|
||||||
|
* but wouldn't be good...
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
/*bb_signals(0
|
/*bb_signals(0
|
||||||
+ (1 << SIGCHLD)
|
+ (1 << SIGCHLD)
|
||||||
+ (1 << SIGTERM)
|
+ (1 << SIGTERM)
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user