If it's needed, there has to be a comment why. There isn't.
function old new delta
.rodata 103686 103669 -17
remove_file 598 571 -27
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-44) Total: -44 bytes
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Add O_NOFOLLOW (and O_NOCTTY for good measure) to open calls like e2fsprogs does.
In lsattr, when recursing, operate only on regular files, symlinks, and directories.
(Otherwise, "lsattr /dev" can e.g. open a watchdog device... not good).
At this time, looks like chattr/lsattr can't operate on symlink inodes -
ioctls do not work on open(O_PATH | O_NOFOLLOW) fds.
function old new delta
lsattr_dir_proc 168 203 +35
change_attributes 410 408 -2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/1 up/down: 35/-2) Total: 33 bytes
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
-R is not an "unset these flags" argument, thus no conflict with "=".
function old new delta
.rodata 103684 103686 +2
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
With FEATURE_VI_REGEX_SEARCH enabled backward searches don't work.
This is problematic on distros that enable regexes, such as Tiny
Core Linux and Fedora.
When calling GNU re_search() with a negative range parameter
(indicating a backward search) the start offset must be set to
the end of the area being searched.
The return value of re_search() is the offset of the matched pattern
from the start of the area being searched. For a successful search
(positive return value) char_search() can return the pointer to
the start of the area plus the offset.
FEATURE_VI_REGEX_SEARCH isn't enabled by default but when it is:
function old new delta
char_search 256 247 -9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-9) Total: -9 bytes
Signed-off-by: Andrey Dobrovolsky <andrey.dobrovolsky.odessa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Should we validate that PID is a number for "taskset -ap PID"?
We don't actually need it, and pathological input like
"../../DIR_WITH_LOTS_OF_PIDS" can only cause "taskset"ing
of many pids. Which is something user can do anyway.
function old new delta
taskset_main 190 181 -9
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Accepting nonsense like "--4", and even "-- -4" is confusing.
function old new delta
parse_expr 917 938 +21
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Was:
xxd: FILE: No such file or directory
xxd: FILE: Bad file descriptor
function old new delta
next 276 278 +2
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
If the motion command used to define the range of a change, yank or
delete fails the whole command should be rejected. BusyBox vi already
handled failed searches in these circumstances. Add some more cases:
- non-existent mark: d'x
- movement beyond end of file: c99999+ or 99999<<
This is implemented using a global variable which is set when a command
error is detected. Unlike the case of motion within a line it's
insufficient to check that the motion command doesn't move the cursor:
this fails to process 'LyL' correctly, for example, as the second 'L'
doesn't move the cursor.
function old new delta
indicate_error 75 82 +7
find_range 686 692 +6
do_cmd 4851 4852 +1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/0 up/down: 14/0) Total: 14 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
In traditional vi and vim line motion commands ('+'/'-'/'j'/'k')
fail if the movement would exceed the bounds of the file. BusyBox vi
allowed such commands to succeed, leaving the cursor on the first or
last character of the file.
Make BusyBox vi work like vi/vim.
For the 'G'/'H'/'L' commands traditional vi treats an out of bounds
result as an error, vim doesn't. BusyBox vi behaves like vim, both
before and after this patch.
function old new delta
do_cmd 4785 4851 +66
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 66/0) Total: 66 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
When ESC is entered to leave insert mode any autoindent should only
be removed if there's no content beyond the indent. This may be the
case if a line has been split by entering insert mode and then
entering a CR.
Add a check to ensure there's only a newline after the indent.
function old new delta
char_insert 912 929 +17
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 17/0) Total: 17 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
