Somehow while applying the bb_do_delay patch a change slipped
in libbb.h that broke compilation.
libbb.h Line 355
extern char bb_path_mtab_file[];
This conflicts with mtab_file.c
#if defined(CONFIG_FEATURE_MTAB_SUPPORT)
const char bb_path_mtab_file[] = "/etc/mtab";
#else
const char bb_path_mtab_file[] = "/proc/mounts";
#endif
Not buying it, eh?
I know I said new features before 1.1, but, well... (I was weak!)
The config file and hotplug modes aren't implemented yet. Might take a stab at
those tomorrow. (I _should_ go back to focusing on the bug triage list.)
CONFIG_ symbol in the kernel, and this clashes with busybox's CONFIG_TR
and CONFIG_WATCHDOG, causing applets.h to barf if they're not switched
on (since the broken headers don't affect kconfig or the makefiles).
Since such broken kernel headers are common enough to crop up every few
months, a simple work around is to move TR and WATCHDOG from CONFIG_
to ENABLE_ early.
messages, C) can show the current association (if any) when called
with only one argument. Update the documentation a lot too.
Remind me to add a test suite for this thing. I think I've figured out
how to handle root-only testsuites...
fixes bug #113 and satisfies a personal need at the same time.
output compares identically to util-linux version. (with
exception of whitespace differences on last lines of output with
non-uniform length, which are neither fixed nor worsened by this
change.)
- change llist_add_to_end as proposed by vodz in http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2005-September/016411.html
- remove unneeded includes, add short boilerplate and copyright to llist.c
- move COMM_LEN from find_pid_by_name to libbb.h and use it in procps_status_t
- add reverse_pidlist() to find_pid_by_name. Will be needed for pidof.
- move to ENABLE_ and use shorter boilerplate.
sizes without selinux-support:
text data bss dec hex filename
356 0 0 356 164 procps/ps.o.with-w
300 0 0 300 12c procps/ps.o.no-w
302 0 0 302 12e procps/ps.o.oorig
This fixes the warning, and makes the binary smaller out of sheer pique.
(Yes, since Manuel did this one it's nice tight code that took several
attempts to shrink, but I was ticked.)
Add the start of a test for uniq; this is about the first 1/3 of the
tests we need for full susv3 coverage of uniq.
