else is a kernel bug. Both 2.4 and 2.6 should get this right now. This
should fix the bug IraquiGeek is seeing (although killall still needs to
be fixed.)
The init applet will restart (re-exec) itsself when it
receives a SIGHUP. However, just before it enters its
main loop, it resets SIGHUP to either re-load the inittab
(or ignore it if no inittab is used). Thus preventing
the re-exec option from being triggerable.
This patch adds a signal handler for SIGQUIT for init that
always causes init to re-exec itsself (along with killing
anything else that might be still running).
Hello, all.
Busybox init does not handle removed inittab entry correctly.
# I'm sorry about my poor english, but you can find
# what I would like to say from patch, isn't it?
even if you apply this path,
when yoy try to change a command line option in inittab,
you have to do following steps.
1. remove old line from initrd
2. send HUP signal to init
3. kill old proces which is invoked from init.
4. append new line to inittab
5. send HUP signal to init, again
patch is against current CVS + last patch witch I send it last.
"kill -HUP 1" reloads inittab, and when I append one line to inittab
and send HUP signal two times, It will starts 2 process.
patch against current CVS is attached.
Hi!
I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in
separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6.
That is, one runs command like
'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options'
and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists.
I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release
candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently
asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing
is needed at all to whether it coded properly.
'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build
directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that.
One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than
source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first.
egor
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:57:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> The following patch changes klogd to use openlog/syslog themself
> instead of calling syslog_msg which always calls the triple
> openlog/syslog/closelog.
Updated patch: get rid of syslog_msg entirely. Request from Erik Andersen.
Bastian
It looks like latest uClibc defines ARCH_HAS_MMU, but a few busybox files
test UCLIBC_HAS_MMU, resulting in vfork() getting called instead of
fork(), etc.
Patch below. Only tested for lash.
Cheers,
-Jamie
the busybox menuconfig triggered my "inacceptable number of spelling mistakes"
upper level, so I decided to make a patch ;-)
I also improved some wording to describe some things in a better way.
Many thanks for an incredible piece of software!
Andreas Mohr, random OSS developer
>I'm sure that no user process use old root now, but when run "umount
>/old_root", it says:
> umount: /old_root: Device or resource busy
>
>I have tried to remount /proc within the new root *after* chroot, but
>get the same result.
>
>
I found the problem, I said that no user process use old root when run
my scripts, but
I'm wrong, actually there is a '3' fd open the file
"/old_root/dev/console". By adding
debug message in init/init.c, I found the problem: when init restart(in
exec_signal()),
before open the new terminal device, there is still a file opened(I
don't know which file it is), so the
terminal device(stdin) get fd '1', and the first dup(0)(stdout) return
'2', the second(stderr) return '3'.
I attach a simple patch to solve this problem.
Here's a pretty crude patch to reload /etc/inittab when init receives a
SIGHUP. The mailing list archives weren't entirely clear on whether or
not it should already happen, but didn't appear to be.
The patch:
* Adds a new function, reload_signal() which just calls
parse_inittab() and run_actions(RESPAWN)
* Before entering the while (1) loop set up SIGHUP to call
reload_signal()
* Modify new_init_action to skip the action if the same command
already exists on the same terminal
This last bit means that changing already running entries is a bit
hairy as you can end up with, for example, two shells running on the
same virtual console. However, for solely adding/removing entries this patch
seems to work quite well.
