477 lines
		
	
	
		
			18 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			477 lines
		
	
	
		
			18 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
Contributing To Busybox
 | 
						|
=======================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This document describes what you need to do to contribute to Busybox, where
 | 
						|
you can help, guidelines on testing, and how to submit a well-formed patch
 | 
						|
that is more likely to be accepted.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The Busybox home page is at: http://busybox.lineo.com
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Pre-Contribution Checklist
 | 
						|
--------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
So you want to contribute to Busybox, eh? Great, wonderful, glad you want to
 | 
						|
help. However, before you dive in, headlong and hotfoot, there are some things
 | 
						|
you need to do:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Checkout the Latest Code from CVS
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This is a necessary first step. Please do not try to work with the last
 | 
						|
released version, as there is a good chance that somebody has already fixed
 | 
						|
the bug you found. Somebody might have even added the feature you had in mind.
 | 
						|
Don't make your work obsolete before you start!
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
For information on how to check out Busybox from CVS, please look at the
 | 
						|
following links:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	http://oss.lineo.com/cvs_anon.html
 | 
						|
	http://oss.lineo.com/cvs_howto.html
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Read the Mailing List
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
No one is required to read the entire archives of the mailing list, but you
 | 
						|
should at least read up on what people have been talking about lately. If
 | 
						|
you've recently discovered a problem, chances are somebody else has too. If
 | 
						|
you're the first to discover a problem, post a message and let the rest of us
 | 
						|
know.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Archives can be found here:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	http://opensource.lineo.com/lists/busybox/
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you have a serious interest in Busybox, i.e., you are using it day-to-day or
 | 
						|
as part of an embedded project, it would be a good idea to join the mailing
 | 
						|
list.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A web-based sign-up form can be found here:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	http://opensource.lineo.com/mailman/listinfo/busybox
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Coordinate with the Applet Maintainer
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Some (not all) of the applets in Busybox are "owned" by a maintainer who has
 | 
						|
put significant effort into it and is probably more familiar with it than
 | 
						|
others. To find the maintainer of an applet, look at the top of the .c file
 | 
						|
for a name following the word 'Copyright' or 'Written by' or 'Maintainer'.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Before plunging ahead, it's a good idea to send a message to the mailing list
 | 
						|
that says: "Hey, I was thinking about adding the 'transmogrify' feature to the
 | 
						|
'foo' applet.  Would this be useful? Is anyone else working on it?" You might
 | 
						|
want to CC the maintainer (if any) with your question.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Areas Where You Can Help
 | 
						|
------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Busybox can always use improvement! If you're looking for ways to help, there
 | 
						|
there are a variety of areas where you could help.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
What Busybox Doesn't Need
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Before listing the areas where you _can_ help, it's worthwhile to mention the
 | 
						|
areas where you shouldn't bother. While Busybox strives to be the "Swiss Army
 | 
						|
Knife" of embedded Linux, there are some applets that will not be accepted:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Any filesystem manipulation tools: Busybox is filesystem independent and
 | 
						|
   we do not want to start adding mkfs/fsck tools for every (or any)
 | 
						|
   filesystem under the sun. (fsck_minix.c and mkfs_minix.c are living on
 | 
						|
   borrowed time.) There are far too many of these tools out there.  Use
 | 
						|
   the upstream version. Not everything has to be part of Busybox.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Any partitioning tools: Partitioning a device is typically done once and
 | 
						|
   only once, and tools which do this generally do not need to reside on the
 | 
						|
   target device (esp a flash device). If you need a partitioning tool, grab
 | 
						|
   one (such as fdisk, sfdisk, or cfdisk from util-linux) and use that, but
 | 
						|
   don't try to merge it into busybox. These are nasty and complex and we
 | 
						|
   don't want to maintain them.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Any disk, device, or media-specific tools: Use the -utils or -tools package
 | 
						|
   that was designed for your device; don't try to shoehorn them into Busybox.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Any architecture specific tools: Busybox is (or should be) architecture
 | 
						|
   independent. Do not send us tools that cannot be used across multiple
 | 
						|
   platforms / arches.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Any daemons that are not essential to basic system operation. To date, only
 | 
						|
   syslogd and klogd meet this requirement. We do not need a web server, an
 | 
						|
   ftp daemon, a dhcp server, a mail transport agent or a dns resolver. If you
 | 
						|
   need one of those, you are welcome to ask the folks on the mailing list for
 | 
						|
   recommendations, but please don't bloat up Busybox with any of these.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Bug Reporting
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you find a bug in Busybox, you can send a bug report to our bug tracking
 | 
						|
system (homepage: http://bugs.lineo.com). Instructions on how to send a bug
 | 
						|
report to the tracking system can be found at:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	http://bugs.lineo.com/Reporting.html
 | 
						|
	
 | 
						|
The README file that comes with Busybox also describes how to submit a bug.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A well-written bug report should include a transcript of a shell session that
 | 
						|
demonstrates the bad behavior and enables anyone else to duplicate the bug on
 | 
						|
their own machine. The following is such an example:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	When I execute Busybox 'date' it produces unexpected results.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	This is using GNU date:
 | 
						|
	$ date
 | 
						|
	Wed Mar 21 14:19:41 MST 2001
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	This is using Busybox date:
 | 
						|
	$ date
 | 
						|
	codswaddle
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Bug Triage
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Validating and confirming bugs is nearly as important as reporting them in the
 | 
						|
first place. It is valuable to know if a bug can be duplicated on a different
 | 
						|
machine, on a different filesystem, on a different architecture, with a
 | 
						|
different C library, and so forth.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
To see a listing of all the bugs currently filed against Busybox, look here:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	http://bugs.lineo.com/db/pa/lbusybox.html
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you have comments to add to a bug (can / can't duplicate, think a bug
 | 
						|
should be closed / reopened), please send it to [bugnumber]@bugs.lineo.com.
 | 
						|
The message you send will automatically be forwarded to the mailing list for
 | 
						|
all to see.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Write Documentation
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Chances are, documentation in Busybox is either missing or needs improvement.
 | 
						|
Either way, help is welcome.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Work is being done to automatically generate documentation from sources,
 | 
						|
especially from the usage.h file. If you want to correct the documentation,
 | 
						|
please make changes to the pre-generation parts, rather than the generated
 | 
						|
documentation. [More to come on this later...]
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
It is preferred that modifications to documentation be submitted in patch
 | 
						|
format (more on this below), but we're a little more lenient when it comes to
 | 
						|
docs. You could, for example, just say "after the listing of the mount
 | 
						|
options, the following example would be helpful..."
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Consult Existing Sources
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
For a quick listing of "needs work" spots in the sources, cd into the Busybox
 | 
						|
directory and run the following:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	for i in TODO FIXME XXX; do grep $i *.[ch]; done
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This will show all of the trouble spots or 'questionable' code. Pick a spot,
 | 
						|
any spot, these are all invitations for you to contribute.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Consult The Bug-Tracking System
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Head to: http://bugs.lineo.com/db/pa/lBusybox.html and look at the bugs on
 | 
						|
there. Pick one you think you can fix, and fix it. If it's a wishlist item and
 | 
						|
someone's requesting a new feature, take a stab at adding it. Everything
 | 
						|
previously said about "reading the mailing list" and "coordinating with the
 | 
						|
applet maintainer" still applies.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Add a New Applet
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you want to add a new applet to Busybox, we'd love to see it. However,
 | 
						|
before you write any code, please ask beforehand on the mailing list something
 | 
						|
like "Do you think applet 'foo' would be useful in Busybox?" or "Would you
 | 
						|
guys accept applet 'foo' into Busybox if I were to write it?" If the answer is
 | 
						|
"no" by the folks on the mailing list, then you've saved yourself some time.
 | 
						|
Conversely, you could get some positive responses from folks who might be
 | 
						|
interested in helping you implement it, or can recommend the best approach.
 | 
						|
Perhaps most importantly, this is your way of calling "dibs" on something and
 | 
						|
avoiding duplication of effort.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Also, before you write a line of code, please read the 'new-applet-HOWTO.txt'
 | 
						|
file in the docs/ directory.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Janitorial Work
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
These are dirty jobs, but somebody's gotta do 'em.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Converting applets to use getopt() for option processing. Type 'grep -L
 | 
						|
   getopt *.c' to get a listing of the applets that currently don't use
 | 
						|
   getopt. If a .c file processes no options, it should have a line that
 | 
						|
   reads: /* no options, no getopt */ somewhere in the file.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Replace any "naked" calls to malloc, calloc, realloc, str[n]dup, fopen with
 | 
						|
   the x* equivalents found in utility.c.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Security audits:
 | 
						|
   http://www.securityfocus.com/frames/?content=/forums/secprog/secure-programming.html
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Synthetic code removal: http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/06/commify.html - This
 | 
						|
   is very Perl-specific, but the advice given in here applies equally well to
 | 
						|
   C.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - C library funciton use audits: Verifying that functions are being used
 | 
						|
   properly (called with the right args), replacing unsafe library functions
 | 
						|
   with safer versions, making sure return codes are being checked, etc.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Where appropriate, replace preprocessor defined macros and values with
 | 
						|
   compile-time equivalents.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Style guide compliance. See: docs/style-guide.txt
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Add testcases to tests/testcases.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Makefile improvements:
 | 
						|
   http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/rmch/recu-make-cons-harm.html
 | 
						|
   (I think the recursive problems are pretty much taken care of at this point, non?)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - "Ten Commandments" compliance: (this is a "maybe", certainly not as
 | 
						|
   important as any of the previous items.)
 | 
						|
    http://web.onetelnet.ch/~twolf/tw/c/ten_commandments.html
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Other useful links:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - the comp.lang.c FAQ: http://web.onetelnet.ch/~twolf/tw/c/index.html#Sources
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Submitting Patches To Busybox
 | 
						|
-----------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Here are some guidelines on how to submit a patch to Busybox.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Making A Patch
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you've got anonymous CVS access set up, making a patch is simple. Just make
 | 
						|
sure you're in the busybox/ directory and type 'cvs diff -bwu > mychanges.patch'.
 | 
						|
You can send the resulting .patch file to the mailing list with a description
 | 
						|
of what it does. (But not before you test it! See the next section for some
 | 
						|
guidelines.) It is preferred that patches be sent as attachments, but it is
 | 
						|
not required.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Also, feel free to help test other people's patches and reply to them with
 | 
						|
comments. You can apply a patch by saving it into your busybox/ directory and
 | 
						|
typing 'patch < mychanges.patch'. Then you can recompile, see if it runs, test
 | 
						|
if it works as advertised, and post your findings to the mailing list.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
NOTE: Please do not include extraneous or irrelevant changes in your patches.
 | 
						|
Please do not try to "bundle" two patches together into one. Make single,
 | 
						|
discreet changes on a per-patch basis. Sometimes you need to make a patch that
 | 
						|
touches code in many places, but these kind of patches are rare and should be
 | 
						|
coordinated with a maintainer.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Testing Guidelines
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
It's considered good form to test your new feature before you submit a patch
 | 
						|
to the mailing list, and especially before you commit a change to CVS. Here
 | 
						|
are some guidelines on how to test your changes.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Always test Busybox applets against GNU counterparts and make sure the
 | 
						|
   behavior / output is identical between the two.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Try several different permutations and combinations of the features you're
 | 
						|
   adding (i.e., different combinations of command-line switches) and make sure
 | 
						|
   they all work; make sure one feature does not interfere with another.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Make sure you test compiling against the source both with the feature
 | 
						|
   turned on and turned off in Config.h and make sure Busybox compiles cleanly
 | 
						|
   both ways.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Run the multibuild.pl script in the tests directory and make sure
 | 
						|
   everything checks out OK. (Do this from within the busybox/ directory by
 | 
						|
   typing: 'tests/multibuild.pl'.)
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Making Sure Your Patch Doesn't Get Lost
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you don't want your patch to be lost or forgotten, send it to the bug
 | 
						|
tracking system (http://bugs.lineo.com). You do this by emailing your patch in
 | 
						|
a message to submit@bugs.lineo.com with a subject line something like this:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	[PATCH] - Adds "transmogrify" feature to "foo"
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In the body, you should have a pseudo-header that looks like the following:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
    Package: busybox
 | 
						|
    Version: v0.50pre (or whatever the current version is)
 | 
						|
    Severity: wishlist
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The remainder of the body should read along these lines:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	This patch adds the "transmogrify" feature to the "foo" applet. I have
 | 
						|
	tested this on [arch] system(s) and it works. I have tested it against the
 | 
						|
	GNU counterparts and the outputs are identical. I have run the scripts in
 | 
						|
	the 'tests' directory and nothing breaks.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Detailed instructions on how to submit a bug to the tracking system are at:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	http://bugs.lineo.com/Reporting.html
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you have a patch that will fix and close a reported bug, please send a
 | 
						|
message to [bugnumber]@bugs.lineo.com with your patch attached. It will catch
 | 
						|
people's attention if you have a subject line like the following:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
	[PATCH INCLUDED] - Fix attached, please apply and close this bug
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Improving Your Chances of Patch Acceptance
 | 
						|
------------------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Even after you send a brilliant patch to the mailing list, sometimes it can go
 | 
						|
unnoticed, un-replied-to, and sometimes (sigh) even lost. This is an
 | 
						|
unfortunate fact of life, but there are steps you can take to help your patch
 | 
						|
get noticed and convince a maintainer that it should be added:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Be Succinct
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
A patch that includes small, isolated, obvious changes is more likely to be
 | 
						|
accepted than a patch that touches code in lots of different places or makes
 | 
						|
sweeping, dubious changes.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Back It Up
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Hard facts on why your patch is better than the existing code will go a long
 | 
						|
way toward convincing maintainers that your patch should be included.
 | 
						|
Specifically, patches are more likely to be accepted if they are provably more
 | 
						|
correct, smaller, faster, simpler, or more maintainable than the existing
 | 
						|
code.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Conversely, any patch that is supported with nothing more than "I think this
 | 
						|
would be cool" or "this patch is good because I say it is and I've got a Phd
 | 
						|
in Computer Science" will likely be ignored.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Follow The Style Guide
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
It's considered good form to abide by the established coding style used in a
 | 
						|
project; Busybox is no exception. We have gone so far as to delineate the
 | 
						|
"elements of Busybox style" in the file docs/style-guide.txt. Please follow
 | 
						|
them.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Work With Someone Else
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Working on a patch in isolation is less effective than working with someone
 | 
						|
else for a variety of reasons. If another Busybox user is interested in what
 | 
						|
you're doing, then it's two (or more) voices instead of one that can petition
 | 
						|
for inclusion of the patch. You'll also have more people that can test your
 | 
						|
changes, or even offer suggestions on better approaches you could take.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Getting other folks interested follows as a natural course if you've received
 | 
						|
responses from queries to applet maintainer or positive responses from folks
 | 
						|
on the mailing list.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
We've made strident efforts to put a useful "collaboration" infrastructure in
 | 
						|
place in the form of mailing lists, the bug tracking system, and CVS. Please
 | 
						|
use these resources.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Send Patches to the Bug Tracking System
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This was mentioned above in the "Making Sure Your Patch Doesn't Get Lost"
 | 
						|
section, but it is worth mentioning again. A patch sent to the mailing list
 | 
						|
might be unnoticed and forgotten. A patch sent to the bug tracking system will
 | 
						|
be stored and closely connected to the bug it fixes.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Be Polite
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The old saying "You'll catch more flies with honey than you will with vinegar"
 | 
						|
applies when submitting patches to the mailing list for approval. The way you
 | 
						|
present your patch is sometimes just as important as the actual patch itself
 | 
						|
(if not more so). Being rude to the maintainers is not an effective way to
 | 
						|
convince them that your patch should be included; it will likely have the
 | 
						|
opposite effect.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Committing Changes to CVS
 | 
						|
-------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you submit several patches that demonstrate that you are a skilled and wise
 | 
						|
coder, you may be invited to become a committer, thus enabling you to commit
 | 
						|
changes directly to CVS. This is nice because you don't have to wait for
 | 
						|
someone else to commit your change for you, you can just do it yourself.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
But note that this is a priviledge that comes with some responsibilities. You
 | 
						|
should test your changes before you commit them. You should also talk to an
 | 
						|
applet maintainer before you make any kind of sweeping changes to somebody
 | 
						|
else's code. Big changes should still go to the mailing list first. Remember,
 | 
						|
being wise, polite, and discreet is more important than being clever.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
When To Commit
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Generally, you should feel free to commit a change if:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Your changes are small and don't touch many files
 | 
						|
 - You are fixing a bug
 | 
						|
 - Somebody has told you that it's okay
 | 
						|
 - It's obviously the Right Thing
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The more of the above are true, the better it is to just commit a change
 | 
						|
directly to CVS.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
When Not To Commit
 | 
						|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Even if you have commit rights, you should probably still post a patch to the
 | 
						|
mailing list if:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 - Your changes are broad and touch many different files
 | 
						|
 - You are adding a feature
 | 
						|
 - Your changes are speculative or experimental (i.e., trying a new algorithm)
 | 
						|
 - You are not the maintainer and your changes make the maintainer cringe
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The more of the above are true, the better it is to post a patch to the
 | 
						|
mailing list instead of committing.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Final Words
 | 
						|
-----------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If all of this seems complicated, don't panic, it's really not that tough. If
 | 
						|
you're having difficulty following some of the steps outlined in this
 | 
						|
document don't worry, the folks on the Busybox mailing list are a fairly
 | 
						|
good-natured bunch and will work with you to help get your patches into shape
 | 
						|
or help you make contributions.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 |