9abf53beb4
Upstream commit: Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:54:01 +0800 eval: Variable assignments on functions are no longer persistent Dirk Fieldhouse <fieldhouse@gmx.net> wrote: > In POSIX.1-2017 ("simultaneously IEEE Std 1003.1™-2017 and The Open > Group Technical Standard Base Specifications, Issue 7") > <http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_09>, > we read under '2.9.1 Simple Commands' > > "Variable assignments shall be performed as follows: > ... > - If the command name is a standard utility implemented as a function > (see XBD Utility), the effect of variable assignments shall be as if the > utility was not implemented as a function. > ... > - If the command name is a function that is not a standard utility > implemented as a function, variable assignments shall affect the current > execution environment during the execution of the function. It is > unspecified: > > * Whether or not the variable assignments persist after the > completion of the function > > * Whether or not the variables gain the export attribute during > the execution of the function > > * Whether or not export attributes gained as a result of the > variable assignments persist after the completion of the function (if > variable assignments persist after the completion of the function)" POSIX used to require the current dash behaviour. However, you're right that this is no longer the case. This patch will remove the persistence of the variable assignment. I have considered the exporting the variables during the function execution but have decided against it because: 1) It makes the code bigger. 2) dash has never done this in the past. 3) You cannot use this portably anyway. Reported-by: Dirk Fieldhouse <fieldhouse@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> function old new delta evalcommand 1606 1635 +29 evalcase 313 317 +4 evalfun 280 268 -12 pushlocalvars 48 - -48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 33/-60) Total: -27 bytes Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
ash_test | ||
hush_test | ||
ash_doc.txt | ||
ash_ptr_hack.c | ||
ash.c | ||
brace.txt | ||
Config.src | ||
cttyhack.c | ||
hush_doc.txt | ||
hush_leaktool.sh | ||
hush.c | ||
Kbuild.src | ||
match.c | ||
match.h | ||
math.c | ||
math.h | ||
random.c | ||
random.h | ||
README | ||
README.job | ||
shell_common.c | ||
shell_common.h |
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/ Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7 http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap01.html Shell & Utilities It says that any of the standard utilities may be implemented as a regular shell built-in. It gives a list of utilities which are usually implemented that way (and some of them can only be implemented as built-ins, like "alias"): alias bg cd command false fc fg getopts jobs kill newgrp pwd read true umask unalias wait http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html Shell Command Language It says that shell must implement special built-ins. Special built-ins differ from regular ones by the fact that variable assignments done on special builtin are *PRESERVED*. That is, VAR=VAL special_builtin; echo $VAR should print VAL. (Another distinction is that an error in special built-in should abort the shell, but this is not such a critical difference, and moreover, at least bash's "set" does not follow this rule, which is even codified in autoconf configure logic now...) List of special builtins: . file : [argument...] break [n] continue [n] eval [argument...] exec [command [argument...]] exit [n] export name[=word]... export -p readonly name[=word]... readonly -p return [n] set [-abCefhmnuvx] [-o option] [argument...] set [+abCefhmnuvx] [+o option] [argument...] set -- [argument...] set -o set +o shift [n] times trap n [condition...] trap [action condition...] unset [-fv] name... In practice, no one uses this obscure feature - none of these builtins gives any special reasons to play such dirty tricks. However. This section also says that *function invocation* should act similar to special built-in. That is, variable assignments done on function invocation should be preserved after function invocation. This is significant: it is not unthinkable to want to run a function with some variables set to special values. But because of the above, it does not work: variable will "leak" out of the function.