Denys Vlasenko a732898fdd ash: [PARSER] Removed noexpand/length check on eofmark
Upstream comment:

	Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 14:21:23 +0800
	[PARSER] Removed noexpand/length check on eofmark

	On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 04:23:35AM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote:
	>
	> } 8<<""
	> ======================

	Actually this (the empty delim) only works with dash by accident.
	I've tried bash and pdksh and they both terminate on the first
	empty line which is what you would expect rather than EOF.  The
	real Korn shell does something completely different.

	I've fixed this in dash to conform to bash/pdksh.

	> In [0] it's stated, that delimiter isn't evaluated (expanded), only
	> quoiting must be checked. That if() seems to be completely bogus.

	OK I agree.  The reason it was there is because the parser would
	have already replaced the dollar sign by an internal representation.

	I've fixed it properly with this patch.

	Test case:

	        cat <<- $a
	                OK
	        $a

	        cat <<- ""
	                OK

	        echo OK

	Old result:

	        dash: Syntax error: Illegal eof marker for << redirection
	        OK

	        echo OK

	New result:

	        OK
	        OK
	        OK

function                                             old     new   delta
parsefname                                           227     152     -75
readtoken1                                          2819    2651    -168
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-243)           Total: -243 bytes

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
2017-07-29 19:57:28 +02:00
..
2017-07-21 09:50:55 +02:00
2017-07-21 09:50:55 +02:00
2017-07-26 00:07:27 +02:00

http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/
Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7


http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap01.html
Shell & Utilities

It says that any of the standard utilities may be implemented
as a regular shell built-in. It gives a list of utilities which
are usually implemented that way (and some of them can only
be implemented as built-ins, like "alias"):

alias
bg
cd
command
false
fc
fg
getopts
jobs
kill
newgrp
pwd
read
true
umask
unalias
wait


http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html
Shell Command Language

It says that shell must implement special built-ins. Special built-ins
differ from regular ones by the fact that variable assignments
done on special builtin are *PRESERVED*. That is,

VAR=VAL special_builtin; echo $VAR

should print VAL.

(Another distinction is that an error in special built-in should
abort the shell, but this is not such a critical difference,
and moreover, at least bash's "set" does not follow this rule,
which is even codified in autoconf configure logic now...)

List of special builtins:

. file
: [argument...]
break [n]
continue [n]
eval [argument...]
exec [command [argument...]]
exit [n]
export name[=word]...
export -p
readonly name[=word]...
readonly -p
return [n]
set [-abCefhmnuvx] [-o option] [argument...]
set [+abCefhmnuvx] [+o option] [argument...]
set -- [argument...]
set -o
set +o
shift [n]
times
trap n [condition...]
trap [action condition...]
unset [-fv] name...

In practice, no one uses this obscure feature - none of these builtins
gives any special reasons to play such dirty tricks.

However. This section also says that *function invocation* should act
similar to special built-in. That is, variable assignments
done on function invocation should be preserved after function invocation.

This is significant: it is not unthinkable to want to run a function
with some variables set to special values. But because of the above,
it does not work: variable will "leak" out of the function.