441 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
441 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
Busybox Style Guide
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
This document describes the coding style conventions used in Busybox. If you
|
|
add a new file to Busybox or are editing an existing file, please format your
|
|
code according to this style. If you are the maintainer of a file that does
|
|
not follow these guidelines, please -- at your own convenience -- modify the
|
|
file(s) you maintain to bring them into conformance with this style guide.
|
|
Please note that this is a low priority task.
|
|
|
|
To help you format the whitespace of your programs, an ".indent.pro" file is
|
|
included in the main Busybox source directory that contains option flags to
|
|
format code as per this style guide. This way you can run GNU indent on your
|
|
files by typing 'indent myfile.c myfile.h' and it will magically apply all the
|
|
right formatting rules to your file. Please _do_not_ run this on all the files
|
|
in the directory, just your own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration Order
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
Here is the order in which code should be laid out in a file:
|
|
|
|
- commented program name and one-line description
|
|
- commented author name and email address(es)
|
|
- commented GPL boilerplate
|
|
- commented longer description / notes for the program (if needed)
|
|
- #includes and #defines
|
|
- const and global variables
|
|
- function declarations (if necessary)
|
|
- function implementations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitespace and Formatting
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
This is everybody's favorite flame topic so let's get it out of the way right
|
|
up front.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tabs vs. Spaces in Line Indentation
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The preference in Busybox is to indent lines with tabs. Do not indent lines
|
|
with spaces and do not indents lines using a mixture of tabs and spaces. (The
|
|
indentation style in the Apache and Postfix source does this sort of thing:
|
|
\s\s\s\sif (expr) {\n\tstmt; --ick.) The only exception to this rule is
|
|
multi-line comments that use an asterisk at the beginning of each line, i.e.:
|
|
|
|
/t/*
|
|
/t * This is a block comment.
|
|
/t * Note that it has multiple lines
|
|
/t * and that the beginning of each line has a tab plus a space
|
|
/t * except for the opening '/*' line where the slash
|
|
/t * is used instead of a space.
|
|
/t */
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, The preference is that tabs be set to display at four spaces
|
|
wide, but the beauty of using only tabs (and not spaces) at the beginning of
|
|
lines is that you can set your editor to display tabs at *whatever* number of
|
|
spaces is desired and the code will still look fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operator Spacing
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Put spaces between terms and operators. Example:
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
for(i=0;i<num_items;i++){
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < num_items; i++) {
|
|
|
|
While it extends the line a bit longer, the spaced version is more
|
|
readable. An allowable exception to this rule is the situation where
|
|
excluding the spacing makes it more obvious that we are dealing with a
|
|
single term (even if it is a compound term) such as:
|
|
|
|
if (str[idx] == '/' && str[idx-1] != '\\')
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
if ((argc-1) - (optind+1) > 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bracket Spacing
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
If an opening bracket starts a function, it should be on the
|
|
next line with no spacing before it. However, if a bracket follows an opening
|
|
control block, it should be on the same line with a single space (not a tab)
|
|
between it and the opening control block statement. Examples:
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
while (!done)
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
do
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Don't do this either:
|
|
|
|
while (!done){
|
|
do{
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
while (!done) {
|
|
do {
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paren Spacing
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Put a space between C keywords and left parens, but not between
|
|
function names and the left paren that starts it's parameter list (whether it
|
|
is being declared or called). Examples:
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
while(foo) {
|
|
for(i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
while (foo) {
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
|
|
|
|
But do functions like this:
|
|
|
|
static int my_func(int foo, char bar)
|
|
...
|
|
baz = my_func(1, 2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cuddled Elses
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Also, please "cuddle" your else statements by putting the else keyword on the
|
|
same line after the right bracket that closes an 'if' statement.
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
if (foo) {
|
|
stmt;
|
|
}
|
|
else {
|
|
stmt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
if (foo) {
|
|
stmt;
|
|
} else {
|
|
stmt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The exception to this rule is if you want to include a comment before the else
|
|
block. Example:
|
|
|
|
if (foo) {
|
|
stmts...
|
|
}
|
|
/* otherwise, we're just kidding ourselves, so re-frob the input */
|
|
else {
|
|
other_stmts...
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable and Function Names
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Use the K&R style with names in all lower-case and underscores occasionally
|
|
used to separate words (e.g., "variable_name" and "numchars" are both
|
|
acceptable). Using underscores makes variable and function names more readable
|
|
because it looks like whitespace; using lower-case is easy on the eyes.
|
|
|
|
Note: The Busybox codebase is very much a mixture of code gathered from a
|
|
variety of sources. This explains why the current codebase contains such a
|
|
hodge-podge of different naming styles (Java, Pascal, K&R, just-plain-weird,
|
|
etc.). The K&R guideline explained above should therefore be used on new files
|
|
that are added to the repository. Furthermore, the maintainer of an existing
|
|
file that uses alternate naming conventions should -- at his own convenience --
|
|
convert those names over to K&R style; converting variable names is a very low
|
|
priority task. Perhaps in the future we will include some magical Perl script
|
|
that can go through and convert files -- left as an exercise to the reader for
|
|
now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid The Preprocessor
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
At best, the preprocessor is a necessary evil, helping us account for platform
|
|
and architecture differences. Using the preprocessor unnecessarily is just
|
|
plain evil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Folly of #define
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Use 'const <type> var' for declaring constants.
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
#define var 80
|
|
|
|
Do this instead, when the variable is in a header file and will be used in
|
|
several source files:
|
|
|
|
const int var = 80;
|
|
|
|
Or do this when the variable is used only in a single source file:
|
|
|
|
static const int var = 80;
|
|
|
|
Declaring variables as '[static] const' gives variables an actual type and
|
|
makes the compiler do type checking for you; the preprocessor does _no_ type
|
|
checking whatsoever, making it much more error prone. Declaring variables with
|
|
'[static] const' also makes debugging programs much easier since the value of
|
|
the variable can be easily queried and displayed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Folly of Macros
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Use 'static inline' instead of a macro.
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
#define mini_func(param1, param2) (param1 << param2)
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
static inline int mini_func(int param1, param2)
|
|
{
|
|
return (param1 << param2);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Static inline functions are greatly preferred over macros. They provide type
|
|
safety, have no length limitations, no formatting limitations, and under gcc
|
|
they are as cheap as macros. Besides, really long macros with backslashes at
|
|
the end of each line are ugly as sin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Folly of #ifdef
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Code cluttered with ifdefs is difficult to read and maintain. Don't do it.
|
|
Instead, put your ifdefs in a header, and conditionally define 'static inline'
|
|
functions, (or *maybe* macros), which are used in the code.
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
ret = my_func(bar, baz);
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
#ifdef BB_FEATURE_FUNKY
|
|
maybe_do_funky_stuff(bar, baz);
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
(in .h header file)
|
|
|
|
#ifndef BB_FEATURE_FUNKY
|
|
static inline void maybe_do_funky_stuff (int bar, int baz) {}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
(in the .c source file)
|
|
|
|
ret = my_func(bar, baz);
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
return -1;
|
|
maybe_do_funky_stuff(bar, baz);
|
|
|
|
The great thing about this approach is that the compiler will optimize away
|
|
the "no-op" case when the feature is turned off.
|
|
|
|
Note also the use of the word 'maybe' in the function name to indicate
|
|
conditional execution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes on Strings
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Strings in C can get a little thorny. Here's some guidelines for dealing with
|
|
strings in Busybox. (There is surely more that could be added to this
|
|
section.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
String Files
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Put all help/usage messages in usage.c. Put other strings in messages.c.
|
|
Putting these strings into their own file is a calculated decision designed to
|
|
confine spelling errors to a single place and aid internationalization
|
|
efforts, if needed. (Side Note: we might want to use a single file - maybe
|
|
called 'strings.c' - instead of two, food for thought).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing String Equivalence
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
There's a right way and a wrong way to test for sting equivalence with
|
|
strcmp():
|
|
|
|
The wrong way:
|
|
|
|
if (!strcmp(string, "foo")) {
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
The right way:
|
|
|
|
if (strcmp(string, "foo") == 0){
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
The use of the "equals" (==) operator in the latter example makes it much more
|
|
obvious that you are testing for equivalence. The former example with the
|
|
"not" (!) operator makes it look like you are testing for an error. In a more
|
|
perfect world, we would have a streq() function in the string library, but
|
|
that ain't the world we're living in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous Coding Guidelines
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The following are important items that don't fit into any of the above
|
|
sections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Model Busybox Applets After GNU Counterparts
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
When in doubt about the proper behavior of a Busybox program (output,
|
|
formatting, options, etc.), model it after the equivalent GNU program.
|
|
Doesn't matter how that program behaves on some other flavor of *NIX; doesn't
|
|
matter what the POSIX standard says or doesn't say, just model Busybox
|
|
programs after their GNU counterparts and nobody has to get hurt.
|
|
|
|
The only time we deviate from emulating the GNU behavior is when:
|
|
|
|
- We are deliberately not supporting a feature (such as a command line
|
|
switch)
|
|
- Emulating the GNU behavior is prohibitively expensive (lots more code
|
|
would be required, lots more memory would be used, etc.)
|
|
- The difference is minor or cosmetic
|
|
|
|
A note on the 'cosmetic' case: Output differences might be considered
|
|
cosmetic, but if the output is significant enough to break other scripts that
|
|
use the output, it should really be fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scope
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
|
|
If a const variable is used only in a single source file, put it in the source
|
|
file and not in a header file. Likewise, if a const variable is used in only
|
|
one function, do not make it global to the file. Instead, declare it inside
|
|
the function body. Bottom line: Make a conscious effort to limit declarations
|
|
to the smallest scope possible.
|
|
|
|
Inside applet files, all functions should be declared static so as to keep the
|
|
global name space clean. The only exception to this rule is the "applet_main"
|
|
function which must be declared extern.
|
|
|
|
If you write a function that performs a task that could be useful outside the
|
|
immediate file, turn it into a general-purpose function with no ties to any
|
|
applet and put it in the utility.c file instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brackets Are Your Friends
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Please use brackets on all if and else statements, even if it is only one
|
|
line. Example:
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
if (foo)
|
|
stmt;
|
|
else
|
|
stmt;
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
if (foo) {
|
|
stmt;
|
|
} else {
|
|
stmt;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The "bracketless" approach is error prone because someday you might add a line
|
|
like this:
|
|
|
|
if (foo)
|
|
stmt;
|
|
new_line();
|
|
else
|
|
stmt;
|
|
|
|
And the resulting behavior of your program would totally bewilder you. (Don't
|
|
laugh, it happens to us all.) Remember folks, this is C, not Python.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function Declarations
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Do not use old-style function declarations that declare variable types between
|
|
the parameter list and opening bracket. Example:
|
|
|
|
Don't do this:
|
|
|
|
int foo(parm1, parm2)
|
|
char parm1;
|
|
float parm2;
|
|
{
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
Do this instead:
|
|
|
|
int foo(char parm1, float parm2)
|
|
{
|
|
....
|
|
|
|
The only time you would ever need to use the old declaration syntax is to
|
|
support ancient, antediluvian compilers. To our good fortune, we have access
|
|
to more modern compilers and the old declaration syntax is neither necessary
|
|
nor desired.
|
|
|