From scan-build w/ clang-16.0.0_pre20230107:
```
../src/librc/librc.c:759:14: warning: Potential leak of memory pointed to by 'init' [unix.Malloc]
return false;
^~~~~
```
Despite this being a 'deptree', it's actually
xmalloc'd in the same function (rc_deptree_update),
and so should be free'd, not rc_deptree_free'd,
as rc_deptree_load* wasn't used to allocate it.
```
[71/213] Compiling C object src/librc/librc.so.1.p/librc-depend.c.o
../src/librc/librc-depend.c: In function ‘rc_deptree_update’:
../src/librc/librc-depend.c:1077:9: warning: ‘rc_deptree_free’ called on pointer returned from a mismatched allocation function [-Wmismatched-dealloc]
1077 | rc_deptree_free(deptree);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../src/shared/misc.h:29,
from ../src/librc/librc.h:57,
from ../src/librc/librc-depend.c:21:
In function ‘xmalloc’,
inlined from ‘rc_deptree_update’ at ../src/librc/librc-depend.c:775:12:
../src/shared/helpers.h:64:23: note: returned from ‘malloc’
64 | void *value = malloc(size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
```
This fixes#563.
(This is analogous to the rc_stringlist change.)
This gives a hint to the compiler that allocations (return values)
from this function should be paired with a corresponding dealloc/free
function.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
This gives a hint to the compiler that allocations (return values)
from this function should be paired with a corresponding dealloc/free
function
In this case, it means that every rc_stringlist that rc_stringlist_new()
returns should eventually be freed by calling rc_stringlist_free(ptr)
where ptr is the relevant rc_stringlist.
We have to add a test for this into the build system
because only GCC supports this for now. In future, we might
be able to use meson's has_function_attribute (it does support
'malloc', just not AFAICT 'malloc with arguments').
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
'services' is still referenced by the list
which gets returned. We can't free it.
Thanks to GCC 11's -fanalyzer.
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Seen on running rc-status.
```
=================================================================
==14636==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Indirect leak of 72 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f443412dcb7 in __interceptor_malloc /usr/src/debug/sys-devel/gcc-11.2.1_p20220312/gcc-11-20220312/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:145
#1 0x7f443400c727 in xmalloc ../src/includes/helpers.h:64
#2 0x7f443400d1f4 in rc_stringlist_add ../src/librc/librc-stringlist.c:32
#3 0x7f4433fecc34 in get_runlevel_chain ../src/librc/librc.c:390
#4 0x7f4433fedc00 in rc_runlevel_stacks ../src/librc/librc.c:519
#5 0x7f4433ff1d8e in rc_services_in_runlevel_stacked ../src/librc/librc.c:976
#6 0x55be0e8f9517 in main ../src/rc/rc-status.c:407
#7 0x7f44334736cf in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
```
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
- drop old build system
- move shared include and source files to common directory
- drop "rc-" prefix from shared include and source files
- move executable-specific code to individual directories under src
- adjust top-level .gitignore file for new build system
This closes#489.
The previous fix excludes PIDs of processes running in a different namespace
regardless of whether the PID has been explicitly stored in a PID file mentioned
in the --pidfile parameter. The correct behavior is to only exclude the pid if
it is not stored in a pidfile.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 776010
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/776010
I am removing this on the advice of a member of the Gentoo toolchain
team. It was explained to me that this doesn't offer any significant
benefits to OpenRC.
If anyone ffeels differently, please open a pull request reverting
this and adding an explanation of what it does and how to know which
functions to mark hidden in the future.
This fixes#301.
readlink(3) does not nul-terminate the result it sticks
into the supplied buffer. Consequently, the code
rc = readlink(path, buf, sizeof(buf));
does not necessarily produce a C string.
The code in rc_find_pid() produces some C strings this way
and passes them to strlen() and strcmp(), which can lead
to an out-of-bounds read.
In this case, since the code already takes care to
zero-initialize the buffers before passing them
to readlink(3), only allow sizeof(buf)-1 bytes to
be returned.
(While fixing this issue, I fixed two other locations that
used the same problematic pattern.)
This fixes#270.
The contents of /proc/<pid>/cmdline are read into
a stack buffer using
bytes = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer));
followed by appending a null terminator to the buffer with
buffer[bytes] = '\0';
If bytes == sizeof(buffer), then this write is out-of-bounds.
Refactor the code to use rc_getfile instead, since PATH_MAX
is not the maximum size of /proc/<pid>/cmdline. (I hit this
issue in practice while compiling Linux; it tripped the
stack-smashing protector.)
This is roughly the same buffer overflow condition
that was fixed by commit 0ddee9b7d2
This fixes#269.
Use errno != EACCES to fix false-positive for non-root users
with grsecurity kernels.
Fixes: 37e2944272 ("librc: Add check for crashed state")
This fixes#237
rc_deptree_update_needed would return early as soon as it found
any file newer than the existing dependency cache. Unfortunately,
the first file found may not be the newest one there; so the
clock skew workaround in rc-misc:_rc_deptree_load would be given
a timestamp that was still too old.
This fix forces a full scan of all relevant files, so as to
ensure that we return a timestamp that will allow the clock skew
fix to operate. The runtime cost is no worse than the case where
the cache is up to date (ie. we must check every possible file).
This fixes#161.
Ignore namespaces if there are errors reading either the pid namespace
for the current process or the process we aare testing.
This fixes https://github.com/openrc/openrc/issues/180.
openrc-init.c and openrc-shutdown.c are based on code which was written by
James Hammons <jlhamm@acm.org>, so I would like to publically
thank him for his work.
The original auto detection of Docker containers assumed the presence of
a container environment variable. However, Docker-1.12 does not
implement this, and I'm not sure which versions of docker implemented
it.
The new test is for the presence of a file named .dockerenv in the
root directory.
