The stat structure was not being initialized correctly in do_check. This
was causing the owner adjustment to be skipped if the first path had the
correct owner.
Also, the "correcting owner" message should always be printed when the
owner is being changed.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 518042
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518042
Remove the recursive call in print_stacked_services which was causing an
infinite loop when using stacked runlevels.
I would like to thank Doug Freed and Jason Zaman for assisting with
tracking this down.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 514972
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514972
The -W option does not need an argument of its own; it can take the
first path after all other options are processed on the command line.
Also, move the processing for the -W option out of the switch so it will
be in the same loop as the other processing.
Before this commit, not specifying -d, -f, -p or -W in a checkpath
command meant the command exited successfully but actually did nothing.
This is an error condition, so report it as such.
Thanks to info and testing done by Daniel Robbins <drobbins@funtoo.org>,
there is now a fix for this. Below is his description of the steps
OpenRC needed to use.
1) See if /proc/<pid>/status exists
2) If it does, see if it has a "envID:" field
3) If it does, see if "envID:" is set to "0"
4) If so, then it's one of the host's processes and should be a
candidate for the list. Otherwise, it is one of the container's
processes and should be ignored.
This should fix the bug and allow start-stop-daemon to work properly on
OpenVZ hosts.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 376817
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376817
The mount and remount options should always be processed. They were only
being processed if -q was not on the command line.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 498206
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498206
The -a option,which only applies to the del command, is used to remove a
service from all runlevels.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 497740
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=497740
This was requested by Debian, because the minicom software, which is
available on Debian and other distros, has a binary named runscript. We
are keeping a backward compatibility symlink for now, but this allows
Debian or any other distro to safely remove the symlink.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 494220
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=494220
The message about a service being scheduled to start was confusing to
some of our users; I was told this wording is more clear.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 493070
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493070
Debian requested this rename due to the "rc" binary conflicting with the
"rc" binary from the plan 9 shell.
We also add a deprecation warning to the binary when it is run as rc to
encourage users to switch to openrc instead.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 493958
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493958
The rc_runlevel_exists function was attempting to treat "." and ".." as
valid runlevels; however, this should not be allowed.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 488710
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488710
Convert these messages to warnings that are only displayed if
EINFO_VERBOSE is set to yes in the environment.
This is based on a suggestion from Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 487588
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=487588
Several calls to do_stop were forcing the test parameter to be true,
which was causing extra output to the terminal, such as:
* Would send signal 0 to pid xxxxx
This should only happen if the --test command line option was used.
We should first check if we are within bounds and then read rather than
the opposite.
This makes valgrind happy.
Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org>
The eerror calls in this function make it too verbose, so change them to
ewarnv() calls instead. This means that they will only print if the
--verbose option is used or EINFO_VERBOSE=yes is set in the environment.
The libeinfo library has no consumers other than OpenRC, so there is no
reason for it to be maintained as a library. The einfo routines are now
an object that links with the rc binary.
Along the same lines as the quiet variable, this is controlled by an
environment variable for the einfo code, so we do not need a separate
boolean flag.
The suppression of output is controlled in the e* functions themselves,
so there is no need for a variable to test in start-stop-daemon.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 482396
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482396
Patch was provided by Max Hacking <max.gentoo.bugzilla@hacking.co.uk>
and slightly fixed by Alexander Vershilov <qnikst@gentoo.org> and
William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>.
Fixes:
1). Rebase to newest OpenRC version.
2). Remove code style fixes. Port to currect code style.
3). Fix rc_runlevel_stack instead of introducing new function.
4). Make get_runlevel_chain a private function.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 467368
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467368
Add an EERROR_QUIET environment variable which works like EINFO_QUIET
but for the eerror functions. This will allow library consumers to
choose whether to suppress eerror messages separately from einfo and
ewarn messages.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 482396
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482396
This makes the eerror* functions honor the EINFO_QUIET environment
variable like the einfo* and ewarn* functions.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 482396
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482396
This reverts commit 4ee62c7903.
The previously referenced commit broke consistency because ewarnx() was
respecting the EINFO_QUIET environment setting, but after this commit,
ewarn() was not.
Also, due to discussion on the below referenced bugs, I think we do
want to suppress warnings when EINFO_QUIET=yes.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 482396
X-Gentoo-Bug: 439174
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=482396
X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439174
The einfo() function tests for the EINFO_QUIET environment variable
directly, and this is the variable that is set by the --quiet flag, so
there was no reason for this test to exist.
