2004-07-06 09:57:35 +05:30
|
|
|
Credit for this belongs to:
|
|
|
|
|
Jim / James C. Warner, <warnerjc@worldnet.att.net>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
Ok, ok, I yield -- most of what follows has been removed from the manual page
|
|
|
|
|
and packaged separately as this README (hey, it was only TEMPORARY insanity).
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
Of course, that means that now absolutely nobody will ever read it.
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
This is probably a good thing...
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Table of Contents ---------------------------------------------------##
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
# the only darn thing that wasn't in the man page
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
CUSTOMIZING the Sources
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
# the following carry their original topic numbers
|
|
|
|
|
DIFFERENCES / New Features
|
|
|
|
|
Interface Etiquette
|
|
|
|
|
Expanded Configurable Display Support
|
|
|
|
|
Enhanced Field/Column Management
|
|
|
|
|
Customization Flexibility
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES and Rantings
|
|
|
|
|
The top Binary
|
|
|
|
|
Comparing Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Stuff
|
|
|
|
|
The top Sources
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLES of Windows
|
|
|
|
|
The 'A' Mode Command Toggle
|
|
|
|
|
STACKIN' & WHACKIN' Windows
|
|
|
|
|
ALL TOGETHER Now, Window(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## CUSTOMIZING the Sources ---------------------------------------------##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed below are the conditionals available should you wish to recompile
|
|
|
|
|
this top. The author's favorite is: PRETEND4CPUS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's the #define allowing you to simulate an SMP environment, and
|
|
|
|
|
(perhaps) impress your friends. It's currently set to display four
|
|
|
|
|
separate CPUs, but could easily be changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caution: do NOT use this provision in an effort to impress someone
|
|
|
|
|
who truly possesses such a machine! The fact that all 4
|
|
|
|
|
CPUs show the same dynamic results will likely have the
|
|
|
|
|
opposite effect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//#define ATEOJ_REPORT /* report a bunch of stuff, at end-of-job */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define CASEUP_HEXES /* show any hex values in upper case */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define CASEUP_SCALE /* show scaled time/num suffix upper case */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define CASEUP_SUMMK /* show memory summary kilobytes with 'K' */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define POSIX_CMDLIN /* use '[ ]' for kernel threads, not '( )' */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define PRETEND2_5_X /* pretend we're linux 2.5.x (for IO-wait) */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define PRETEND4CPUS /* pretend we're smp with 4 ticsers (sic) */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define PRETENDNOCAP /* use a terminal without essential caps */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define SORT_SUPRESS /* *attempt* to reduce qsort overhead */
|
2002-11-25 03:34:03 +05:30
|
|
|
//#define STDOUT_IOLBF /* disable our own stdout _IOFBF override */
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
//#define USE_LIB_STA3 /* use lib status (3 ch) vs. proc_t (1 ch) */
|
|
|
|
|
//#define WARN_NOT_SMP /* restrict '1' & 'I' commands to true smp */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 6. DIFFERENCES / New Features ---------------------------------------##
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes differences between this top and your
|
|
|
|
|
former top. It was originally based on procps-2.0.7. However,
|
|
|
|
|
except for the separate/summary CPU toggle, all of these differ-
|
|
|
|
|
ences also apply through procps-2.0.10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6a. Interface Etiquette
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Input and output are far more carefully implemented in
|
|
|
|
|
this top. You won't be subjected to 4 - 5 'Unknown command'
|
|
|
|
|
messages should you press the wrong key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- You need suffer a confirmation message only when the results
|
|
|
|
|
of a command are not obvious by their effects on the display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- The Help screen will no longer overflow, even when running
|
|
|
|
|
with a 24 row xterm (vt100).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- The fields selection/ordering screens do not carelessly
|
|
|
|
|
destroy important information through unintended line wraps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Should you narrow a xterm window to less than 80 columns
|
|
|
|
|
while this top is running, you will not be left with an
|
|
|
|
|
utterly worthless, embarrassing display.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6b. Expanded Configurable Display Support
|
|
|
|
|
-*- In an SMP environment, you can choose between a summary dis-
|
|
|
|
|
play or you may show each cpu separately. No longer must
|
|
|
|
|
this choice be irrevocably made at startup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- There are new fields and with this top, any field is
|
|
|
|
|
selectable for sorting. Plus, your sorted column can be
|
|
|
|
|
instantly reversed with just a single keystroke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- You may optionally apply 2 distinct types of highlighting to
|
|
|
|
|
running tasks and/or sorted columns. With this top, you'll
|
|
|
|
|
be able to instantly spot running tasks and always know the
|
|
|
|
|
current sort field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- While you could continue to use the more familiar (and
|
|
|
|
|
boring) monochrome display, you might want to try this top's
|
|
|
|
|
new color display. You can even create your own unique col-
|
|
|
|
|
ors used in summaries, messages, headings and tasks, each of
|
|
|
|
|
which can be made persistent until you choose to change them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Up to four separate windows can be displayed simultaneously,
|
|
|
|
|
giving you four separate ways to sort and view the tasks cur-
|
|
|
|
|
rently cluttering up your system. You could have one view by
|
|
|
|
|
pids, another by cpu usage, yet another showing memory con-
|
|
|
|
|
sumption. You get the idea...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Each window comes with pre-configured (but user configurable)
|
|
|
|
|
fields and you can size each window individually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Virtually every one of this top's options (summaries, fields,
|
|
|
|
|
colors, sorted column, etc.) is separately configurable for
|
|
|
|
|
each of those four windows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heck, you can even change a window's name, if you don't care
|
|
|
|
|
for top's choices. Your changes will be reflected not only
|
|
|
|
|
when you're in what top calls alternate-display mode but also
|
|
|
|
|
on his special new 'Windows' help screen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- And, [ ** Drum-Roll + Ta-Da ** ] with just one keystroke you
|
|
|
|
|
can quickly switch between full-screen and multiple window
|
|
|
|
|
modes! Or, with a different keystroke, toggle a single win-
|
|
|
|
|
dow Off for now, then On again later!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6c. Enhanced Field/Column Management
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Many Field/Column names have been changed to make them more
|
|
|
|
|
intuitive, more self-descriptive. And with this top you
|
|
|
|
|
won't be fooled with field choices that are "not yet imple-
|
|
|
|
|
mented".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Task memory statistics are more meaningful and more accurate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- You'll finally have complete display integrity regardless of
|
|
|
|
|
field selections, their order or screen width. And that
|
|
|
|
|
means the command column no longer need be kept as the right-
|
|
|
|
|
most field, lest your screen turn to <bleep> when all the
|
|
|
|
|
following columns get misaligned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6d. Customization Flexibility
|
|
|
|
|
-*- You have complete program naming freedom with no internal
|
|
|
|
|
ties to a specific personal configuration file. Symbolic
|
|
|
|
|
links could be used to establish different configuration
|
|
|
|
|
files reflecting the different personalities of your cus-
|
|
|
|
|
tomized "tops", under whatever aliases you've used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thus, you could have an alias for running top in 'Batch
|
|
|
|
|
mode', another for when you work from the Linux console and
|
|
|
|
|
maybe a third used with X-Windows. All of that, yet still
|
|
|
|
|
just a single binary image!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- All of your configuration choices can be preserved in a per-
|
|
|
|
|
sonal configuration file, including any changes made on a
|
|
|
|
|
per-window basis. Thus, once you personalize things they
|
|
|
|
|
remain personalized until you decide to change them again.
|
|
|
|
|
This top has been completely cured of:
|
|
|
|
|
i-cant-remember-so-please-do-that-all-over-again
|
|
|
|
|
( and again, and again ... )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The bottom line is this: if you save your configuration
|
|
|
|
|
before quitting top, upon restart the display will appear
|
|
|
|
|
exactly as you left it. And that means you no longer have to
|
|
|
|
|
keep top running until-the-end-of-time (ok, a long time
|
|
|
|
|
anyway), lest your customizations go bye-bye.
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## 7. NOTES and Rantings -----------------------------------------------##
|
|
|
|
|
7a. The top Binary
|
|
|
|
|
To whom it may (should) concern: this top, even with its vastly
|
|
|
|
|
expanded capabilities, is only slightly larger than the old top.
|
|
|
|
|
Were it not for extensive help text and additional sort callbacks,
|
|
|
|
|
it would be smaller.
|
|
|
|
|
Throw source carelessly at objectives, it will
|
|
|
|
|
produce equally careless machine instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
example: (num_pages - an_address)/1024 == duh?
|
|
|
|
|
kicker: document result as broken, due to elf!
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
I know you're out there, are you getting this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, as for all those new capabilities like colors and windows and
|
|
|
|
|
highlighting, you'd expect this top to be the "mother of all pigs"
|
|
|
|
|
compared to old top -- right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea, with this top expect following piglets:
|
|
|
|
|
. A smaller virtual image and resident footprint
|
|
|
|
|
. Slightly fewer major page faults
|
|
|
|
|
. A large reduction in minor page faults for SMP
|
|
|
|
|
. The same or better response time
|
|
|
|
|
. The same or even less CPU costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally any comparison of the old and new top should be against
|
|
|
|
|
the same libproc format (32-bit or 64-bit tics) and run in a true
|
|
|
|
|
or simulated SMP environment (producing separate CPU stats). This
|
|
|
|
|
latter requirement will coax old top into handling his own
|
|
|
|
|
'/proc/stat' access -- something this top always does, but with
|
|
|
|
|
less cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7b. Comparing Performance
|
|
|
|
|
Even with equivalent libraries and '/proc/stat' access, it's dif-
|
|
|
|
|
ficult to accurately compare tops using their own displays.
|
|
|
|
|
Results for these cpu-intensive programs (who frequently exceed
|
|
|
|
|
their time-slice) generally show a wide disparity in %CPU. This
|
|
|
|
|
is due to differing call patterns, kernel preemptions and the tim-
|
|
|
|
|
ing of process snapshots. For slightly better results, start each
|
|
|
|
|
program with the following commands:
|
|
|
|
|
./old-top -d 0.5
|
|
|
|
|
nice -n-10 ./new-top -d 0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While actually putting this top at a performance disadvantage, the
|
|
|
|
|
higher scheduling priority and staggered timing will periodically
|
|
|
|
|
yield a somewhat truer picture. You could even reverse those
|
|
|
|
|
roles and get similar results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most consistent performance results will be obtained 'off-
|
|
|
|
|
line', using your shell's time pipe or the time program itself.
|
|
|
|
|
And even in a single processor environment or without equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
libraries, total cpu costs (user time + system time) are similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, this top's cpu costs ARE influenced by the capabilities
|
|
|
|
|
you choose to exploit, even if they don't SEEM to be reflected in
|
|
|
|
|
such timings. So let's examine some...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7c. Cost of Stuff
|
|
|
|
|
Colors Cost -- Nada (almost).
|
|
|
|
|
Once the terminfo strings are built (at and during a user's
|
|
|
|
|
behest) they are SAVED with each window's stuff. And while
|
|
|
|
|
there will be extra tty escape sequences transmitted because of
|
|
|
|
|
colors, it makes no difference which 'char *' is actually used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Highlighting Cost -- Nada (maybe), or blame it on Rio.
|
|
|
|
|
On second thought, let's blame it on the user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For row highlighting, there is only the cost of those extra tty
|
|
|
|
|
escape sequences (same as for colors). For column highlight-
|
|
|
|
|
ing, there is a fairly significant cost associated with column
|
|
|
|
|
transition management combined with even more tty output.
|
|
|
|
|
These increased costs are incurred on every task display row.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sooo... hey USER -- do NOT highlight COLUMNS. You shouldn't
|
|
|
|
|
need a constant visual reminder of your chosen sort field.
|
|
|
|
|
However, if you forget which field top is sorting it can serve
|
|
|
|
|
as a quick visual reminder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Windows Cost -- Nada (if just 1 window).
|
|
|
|
|
If more than 1 window, almost certainly NOT Nada so blame it on
|
|
|
|
|
reality. Colors are not an issue, but those sort fields are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we could trust the user to always select the same 'c' state,
|
|
|
|
|
'S' state and sort field (hey, why ya got multiple windows then
|
|
|
|
|
user, huh?) AND if we can trust someone to recompile top with a
|
|
|
|
|
#define enabled, then we could achieve 'Nada'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, not likely, so we're gonna' be doing multiple sorts. BUT,
|
|
|
|
|
it may not be as bad as it sounds. Those sorts involve point-
|
|
|
|
|
ers only. And, that's as good as it gets ! (right Mr. N?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7d. The top Sources
|
|
|
|
|
top.h
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike his predecessor, this top has a proper header file. It
|
|
|
|
|
contains ONLY declarations, NOT definitions. And there are
|
|
|
|
|
several conditionals present to help with further customiza-
|
|
|
|
|
tions and experimentation. All are Off by default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
top.c
|
|
|
|
|
Hopefully proves that source code needn't be a disorganized,
|
|
|
|
|
misaligned MESS. And, WHO says a source listing shouldn't
|
|
|
|
|
occasionally make you SMILE? Why, top.c even does a darn good
|
|
|
|
|
job of following the suggestions in a document hardly anybody
|
|
|
|
|
seems to observe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Linus Torvalds CodingStyle guidelines ...
|
|
|
|
|
-*- -*- -*- on indentation + etc. -*- -*- -*-
|
|
|
|
|
well almost all, except for those stinkin'...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose even Linus Torvalds is entitled to err now and again.
|
|
|
|
|
How so you say? Tabs, me' bucko, stinkin' tabs! That, plus the
|
|
|
|
|
simplistic position regarding indentation espoused in that other-
|
|
|
|
|
wise excellent document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- Rant On, and on -*-
|
|
|
|
|
Let's compare two approaches to the tab/indentation issue with a
|
|
|
|
|
small code sample using tabs then spaces. This snippet happens to
|
|
|
|
|
be the key to top's use of dynamic colors on many static screens,
|
|
|
|
|
while also ensuring screen width isn't exceeded so as to avoid
|
|
|
|
|
line wraps. We'll view just the first 40 columns, assuming one
|
|
|
|
|
wishes to occasionally provide comments to the right of actual
|
|
|
|
|
code (you do, don't you?).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then YOU decide which approach makes the most SENSE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stinkin' Tabs versus Spaces: the Linus way
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, where'd my +----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4+
|
|
|
|
|
many code lines | while (*sub_beg) { :
|
|
|
|
|
up-and-gone-to? | switch (*sub_end:
|
|
|
|
|
| case 0: :
|
|
|
|
|
Gosh, wonder if | \ Tabs Induced / :
|
|
|
|
|
Linus expects a | case 1: :
|
|
|
|
|
fellow to stick | + WASTE-Lands! + case 5: :
|
|
|
|
|
his comments on | :
|
|
|
|
|
the left side?! | + Not a Living + :
|
|
|
|
|
| :
|
|
|
|
|
Ever see source | + line-of-code + :
|
|
|
|
|
with not enough | :
|
|
|
|
|
whitespace; and | / To Be Found! \ :
|
|
|
|
|
this is better? | default::
|
|
|
|
|
| :
|
|
|
|
|
Oh lookie here, \ } :
|
|
|
|
|
there's just a hint of REAL code! ----> if (0 >= room) b:
|
|
|
|
|
/ } /* end: while 'subtrin:
|
|
|
|
|
+----------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spaces versus Stinkin' Tabs: the other way
|
|
|
|
|
+----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4+
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, now this is | while (*sub_beg) { :
|
|
|
|
|
Visible hackin'! | switch (*sub_end) { :
|
|
|
|
|
| case 0: :
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, wonder how | *(sub_end + 1) = '\0'; :
|
|
|
|
|
many programmers | case 1: case 2: case 3: case:
|
|
|
|
|
read those lines | case 5: case 6: case 7: case:
|
|
|
|
|
from the LEFT to | cap = Curwin->captab[(int:
|
|
|
|
|
the RIGHT? This | *sub_end = '\0'; :
|
2002-10-19 02:37:49 +05:30
|
|
|
"innovation" may | PUTP("%s%.*s%s", cap, roo:
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
possibly benefit | room -= (sub_end - sub_be:
|
|
|
|
|
those particular | sub_beg = ++sub_end; :
|
|
|
|
|
kinds of people, | break; :
|
|
|
|
|
you agree? Duh! | default: :
|
|
|
|
|
| ++sub_end; :
|
|
|
|
|
AND, there might | } :
|
|
|
|
|
even be room for | if (0 >= room) break; :
|
|
|
|
|
unseen comments! | } /* end: while 'subtrings' */ :
|
|
|
|
|
+----------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gosh, I just don't KNOW -- it's such a TOUGH choice...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh you Stinkin' Tabs: correspondence, Who-Cares; documentation,
|
|
|
|
|
Oh-Alright; even scripts, Well-If-You-Must. But you have NO place
|
|
|
|
|
within the code-space of MY C-source listing! So be gone
|
|
|
|
|
already!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Summation...
|
|
|
|
|
- If you want to use tabs to the right of the code, go-for-it.
|
|
|
|
|
But PLEASE, not ever in the C-source code-space, thank-you-
|
|
|
|
|
kindly. Just use three little ol' spaces (exactly 3, no-more,
|
|
|
|
|
no-less) where you WOULD have stuck a stinkin' tab.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We'll get far more READABLE files, much less WAISTED precious
|
|
|
|
|
horizontal space, more consistent CURSORS and on, and ON, AND
|
|
|
|
|
ON! Plus, without those awful *the-devil's-own-handiwork*, the
|
|
|
|
|
aforementioned document need NEVER speak of their EVILS again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Lastly, since SPACES (not stinkin' tabs) are SO beneficial,
|
|
|
|
|
maybe we should use just a few more of 'em. Some of those C-
|
|
|
|
|
thingies are VERY sensitive -- they don't like being TOUCHED
|
|
|
|
|
by any other syntax element! Which ones? Why these guys:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
braces, reserved words and binary operators
|
|
|
|
|
( it's the TRUTH, they told me themselves )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's so EASY to keep 'em HAPPY! And lo-and-behold, the combi-
|
|
|
|
|
nation of <sp>thingy<sp> turns out to be a darn effective bug
|
|
|
|
|
repellent, too. So much so, one can actually code while
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALLY NUDE yet still avoid them ol' bug-bytes (sic-sic)!
|
|
|
|
|
step
|
|
|
|
|
down_from
|
|
|
|
|
me_punctilious
|
|
|
|
|
soap-box_once_again
|
|
|
|
|
[1 +5 +5 +5 = huh?]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-10-24 03:18:11 +05:30
|
|
|
## 4c. EXAMPLES of Windows ---------------------------------------------##
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- The 'A' Mode Command Toggle -*-
|
|
|
|
|
Here's what you'll see when you first invoke the alternate-display
|
|
|
|
|
mode interactive command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This particular display was produce on a VT100 xterm, with only 24
|
|
|
|
|
rows. All four task displays are visible, but they could not be sized
|
|
|
|
|
the same. Available lines are parceled out in the fairest way possi-
|
|
|
|
|
ble so the last two task displays have an extra line each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice the 'current' window name in the summary area -- it's been
|
|
|
|
|
emphasized because the associated task display is visible. Since
|
|
|
|
|
1:Def has a task area, the full range of interactive commands would be
|
|
|
|
|
at your disposal. But remember, many of those commands will apply
|
|
|
|
|
only to window 1:Def.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
1:Def name is bold, |1:Def - 15:46:37 up 16:25, 9 users, :
|
|
|
|
|
thus all commands |Tasks: 76 total, 1 running, 75 sle:
|
|
|
|
|
will be available. |Cpu(s): 0.7% user, 1.3% system, :
|
|
|
|
|
|Mem: 126588k total, 123688k used,:
|
|
|
|
|
|Swap: 265032k total, 8232k used,:
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________:
|
|
|
|
|
Tough luck windows |1__PID_USER______PR__NI_%CPU____TIME+_:
|
|
|
|
|
#1 & 2 - you lost | 7343 jtwm 16 0 0.9 0:00.59:
|
|
|
|
|
one line each -- | 7339 jtwm 9 0 0.0 0:00.02:
|
|
|
|
|
guess you'll just |__7337_root_______9___0__0.0___0:01.30:
|
|
|
|
|
have to learn how |2__PID__PPID_Command____________TIME+_:
|
|
|
|
|
to live with it. | 997 952 kdeinit 17:59.59:
|
|
|
|
|
| 1115 952 kdeinit 2:16.47:
|
|
|
|
|
|__1803__1116_led_______________1:55.30:
|
|
|
|
|
|3__PID_%MEM__VIRT_SWAP__RES_CODE_DATA_:
|
|
|
|
|
The #3 & #4 windows | 4634 12.3 15620 0 15m 860 14m :
|
|
|
|
|
better not gloat | 7337 11.3 14396 92 13m 36 13m :
|
|
|
|
|
over 1 extra line. | 923 10.6 30524 16m 13m 1120 12m :
|
|
|
|
|
That user could yet |___991__7.2__9492__316_9176___12_9164_:
|
|
|
|
|
sock 'em with the |4_UID_USER_____GROUP____TTY________PID:
|
|
|
|
|
'n' command and | 43 xfs xfs ? 806:
|
|
|
|
|
take those lines, | 0 ykde users pts/7 5561:
|
|
|
|
|
plus others, away! | 0 wgnome users pts/7 5560:
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 root root pts/7 5325:
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, what say we start applying some of those "full range of interac-
|
|
|
|
|
tive commands"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onward + Downward...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- STACKIN' & WHACKIN' Windows -*-
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa, hold on mate. Someone has already whacked these windows. See,
|
|
|
|
|
there are no task areas for windows 1:Def and 4:Usr. Well, we can at
|
|
|
|
|
least retrace their steps...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's what was done, after issuing the 'A' command and entering
|
|
|
|
|
alternate-display mode.
|
|
|
|
|
1) When #1 was the 'current' window, '-' was pressed,
|
|
|
|
|
toggling Off the associated task display
|
|
|
|
|
( if 'l t m' had been applied to its summary, too )
|
|
|
|
|
( then there'll be only a msg line when 'current' )
|
|
|
|
|
2) Then the 'w' key was struck to cycle backward,
|
|
|
|
|
making 4:Usr the 'current' window
|
|
|
|
|
(could have used 'a a a', if one likes to type)
|
|
|
|
|
3) Then step #1 was repeated, and bye-bye window #4
|
|
|
|
|
4) Finally, window #2 was made the 'current' window
|
|
|
|
|
( Q. how many keystrokes were used? )
|
|
|
|
|
( A. minimum of 2: 'a a' or 'w w'. )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
No 'l','t','m','1' |2:Top - 15:48:35 up 16:27, 9 users, :
|
|
|
|
|
commands have been |Tasks: 75 total, 1 running, 74 sle:
|
|
|
|
|
issued here, |Cpu(s): 2.0% user, 0.7% system, :
|
|
|
|
|
but... |Mem: 126588k total, 123712k used,:
|
|
|
|
|
|Swap: 265032k total, 8232k used,:
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________:
|
|
|
|
|
#2's been changed; |2__PID__PPID_Command____________TIME+_:
|
|
|
|
|
user applied a 'c' | 997 952 kdeinit: konsol 18:00.70:
|
|
|
|
|
command (when it | 1115 952 kdeinit: konsol 2:16.47:
|
|
|
|
|
was current) - now | 1803 1116 led tiptop.HELP 1:55.30:
|
|
|
|
|
shows cmd lines vs. | 923 922 X :0 1:09.60:
|
|
|
|
|
program names; | 973 1 klaptopdaemon 0:59.63:
|
|
|
|
|
still seems to be | 981 952 /usr/bin/artsd 0:48.63:
|
|
|
|
|
sorted on TIME+ | 987 1 kdeinit: kdeskt 0:24.34:
|
|
|
|
|
though |___991_____1_kdeinit:_kicker___0:04.59:
|
|
|
|
|
|3__PID_%MEM__VIRT_SWAP__RES_CODE_DATA_:
|
|
|
|
|
This #3 guy appears | 4634 12.3 15620 0 15m 860 14m :
|
|
|
|
|
to still be running | 7337 11.3 14396 92 13m 36 13m :
|
|
|
|
|
with the supplied | 923 10.6 30544 16m 13m 1120 12m :
|
|
|
|
|
defaults, but no | 991 7.2 9492 316 9176 12 9164 :
|
|
|
|
|
telling what damage | 7329 7.0 9036 140 8896 36 8860 :
|
|
|
|
|
might have been | 1115 6.9 8956 160 8796 36 8760 :
|
|
|
|
|
done to it's | 987 6.4 8668 524 8144 20 8124 :
|
|
|
|
|
summary info stuff | 1131 6.4 8268 144 8124 36 8088 :
|
|
|
|
|
+--------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And that's what brought us to this current state. No, wait. Oh
|
|
|
|
|
lordy, will you look at that -- someone has changed the name of win-
|
|
|
|
|
dow #2 from 'Job' to 'Top'!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How'd they do that? Well, they just issued the 'g' interactive com-
|
|
|
|
|
mand, of course. That command is available whenever alternate-display
|
|
|
|
|
mode is active and always impacts just the 'current' window. Gosh,
|
|
|
|
|
you can even issue the 'g' command when 'l' has toggled Off the very
|
|
|
|
|
summary area line containing the window name!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almost Done...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-*- ALL TOGETHER Now, Window(s) -*-
|
|
|
|
|
Here, the window 1:Def task display has been toggled Off but it
|
|
|
|
|
remains the 'current' window. Since there is no task area, many com-
|
|
|
|
|
mands will be restricted. However, the commands ('l', 't', 'm', '1')
|
|
|
|
|
affecting the summary area, as well as some other global commands
|
|
|
|
|
('k', 'Z', etc.), would still be active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that the Mem and Swap lines are not shown. This means that the
|
|
|
|
|
loser (oops, user) has, in fact, issued the 'm' command! Now, if you
|
|
|
|
|
were to cycle the 'current' window with the 'a' or 'w' commands, the
|
|
|
|
|
task display would remain the same (except possibly growing/shrinking
|
|
|
|
|
slightly) but the summary area would change periodically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The comments to the left of the image provide additional insights into
|
|
|
|
|
how things came to be. Note especially the comments for window 4:Usr
|
|
|
|
|
-- the one with some empty rows...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1:Def no highlight, +--------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
thus disabled cmds: |1:Def - 15:50:32 up 16:29, 9 users, :
|
|
|
|
|
b,i,n,u,x,y, etc. |Tasks: 75 total, 2 running, 73 sle:
|
|
|
|
|
& m = lost Mem/Swap |Cpu(s): 10.6% user, 0.0% system, :
|
|
|
|
|
|______________________________________:
|
|
|
|
|
2:Job was very busy: |2__PID__PPID_Command____________TIME+_:
|
|
|
|
|
'n' cmd, w/ 7 tasks | 80 1 ( khubd ) 0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
'c' cmd, cmd line | 6 0 ( kreclaimd ) 0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
'O' cmd, sort cmd | 9 1 ( mdrecoveryd ) 0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
'R' cmd, sort bkwd | 11358 1 /bin/bash/ /usr 0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
'x' cmd, hi column | 1297 1 /sbin/mingetty 0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
(when 2 WAS current) | 683 1 xinetd -stayali 0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
|___836_____1_login_--_root_____0:00.00:
|
|
|
|
|
3:Mem has altered |3__PID_%MEM__VIRT_SWAP__RES_CODE_DATA_:
|
|
|
|
|
some std defaults: | 4634 12.3 15620 0 15m 860 14m :
|
|
|
|
|
'y' turned Off | 7337 11.3 14396 92 13m 36 13m :
|
|
|
|
|
'x' turned On | 923 10.6 30544 16m 13m 1120 12m :
|
|
|
|
|
(when 3 WAS current) | 991 7.2 9492 316 9176 12 9164 :
|
|
|
|
|
|__7329__7.0__9036__140_8896___36_8860_:
|
|
|
|
|
Huh? 4:Usr has some |4_UID_USER_____GROUP____TTY________PID:
|
|
|
|
|
blank rows! ? ? ? ? | 0 jtwm root pts/2 5561:
|
|
|
|
|
Aha, the 'i' command | 0 root root ? 5560:
|
|
|
|
|
applied (when 4 WAS | :
|
|
|
|
|
current); could be | :
|
|
|
|
|
reversed with '=', | :
|
|
|
|
|
when 4 IS current! +--------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok now, how about that 'current' window 1:Def and its unseen tasks?
|
|
|
|
|
At any time, you can quickly retrieve lost tasks in a number of ways:
|
|
|
|
|
1) Press '-', toggling just the 'current' window
|
|
|
|
|
2) Press '_', toggling all visible/invisible windows
|
|
|
|
|
( 1:Def is the only window currently not shown )
|
|
|
|
|
( afterward, it'll be the only window showing! )
|
|
|
|
|
* 3) Press '+', forcing all task displays to become visible
|
|
|
|
|
4) Press 'A' to return to full-screen mode,
|
|
|
|
|
with only 1:Def tasks shown and without a window name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that should be enough ways of getting a task area visible again to
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy almost any user, don't ya think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Use #3 above when you've messed up your screen beyond
|
|
|
|
|
redemption. The four task displays will reappear, nice and even.
|
|
|
|
|
They will also have retained any customizations you had previously
|
|
|
|
|
applied, except for the 'i' (idle tasks) and 'n' (max tasks) com-
|
|
|
|
|
mands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's It ! Piece of Cake !! Enjoy them there windows !!!
|
2002-10-14 03:27:07 +05:30
|
|
|
|
