docs: tweak both of those newly created man docs a tad
An important fact was omitted in the DEBUGGING section for the two newest man documents. Users must utilize a macro in the header files before verification happens. So, this commit will sneak in such mention and in that way reduce future liability if the feature won't work. Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d64755ea5f
commit
9b3436e0e4
@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ Success is indicated by a pointer to the named structure.
|
||||
To aid in program development, there is a provision that can
|
||||
help ensure `result' member references agree with library
|
||||
expectations.
|
||||
It assumes that a supplied macro in the header file is
|
||||
used to access the `result' value.
|
||||
|
||||
This feature can be activated through either of the following
|
||||
methods and any discrepancies will be wrtten to \fBstderr\fR.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ The following would be a typical sequence of calls to
|
||||
this interface.
|
||||
|
||||
.nf
|
||||
.RB "1. " procps_pids_new()
|
||||
.RB "2. " procps_pids_get() ", " procps_pids_reap() " or " procps_pids_select()
|
||||
.RB "3. " procps_pids_unref()
|
||||
.RB "1. " fatal_proc_unmounted()
|
||||
.RB "2. " procps_pids_new()
|
||||
.RB "3. " procps_pids_get() ", " procps_pids_reap() " or " procps_pids_select()
|
||||
.RB "4. " procps_pids_unref()
|
||||
.fi
|
||||
|
||||
Optionally, a user may choose to sort results returned from
|
||||
@ -158,6 +159,9 @@ Success is indicated by a pointer to the named structure.
|
||||
To aid in program development, there is a provision that can
|
||||
help ensure `result' member references agree with library
|
||||
expectations.
|
||||
It assumes that a supplied macro in the header file is
|
||||
used to access the `result' value.
|
||||
|
||||
This feature can be activated through either of the following
|
||||
methods and any discrepancies will be wrtten to \fBstderr\fR.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user