Enforce a maximum max_rightward of OUTBUF_SIZE-1, because it is used in
constructs such as "snprintf(outbuf, max_rightward+1," (we could remove
the extra check at the beginning of forest_helper() now, but we decided
to leave it, as a precaution and reminder).
The minimum max_rightward check is not strictly needed, because it is
unsigned. However, we decided to add it anyway:
- most of the other variables are signed;
- make it visually clear that this case is properly handled;
- ideally, the minimum max_rightward should be 1, not 0 (to prevent
integer overflows such as "max_rightward-1"), but this might change
the behavior/output of ps, so we decided against it, for now.
Instead, we fixed the only function that overflows if max_rightward is
0. Also, enforce the same safe range for max_leftward, although it is
never used throughout the code-base.
1/ Do not go deeper than the size of forest_prefix[], to prevent a
buffer overflow (sizeof(forest_prefix) is roughly 128K, but the maximum
/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max is 4M). (actually, we go deeper, but we stop
adding bytes to forest_prefix[])
2/ Always null-terminate forest_prefix[] at the current level.
This patch solves several problems:
1/ Limit the number of characters written (to outbuf) to OUTBUF_SIZE-1
(-1 for the null-terminator).
2/ Always null-terminate outbuf at q.
3/ Move the "rightward" checks *before* the strcpy() calls.
4/ Avoid an integer overflow in these checks (e.g., rightward-4).
May happen if strlen(src) > INT_MAX for example. This patch prevents
escaped_copy() from increasing maxroom and returning -1 (= number of
bytes consumed in dst).
This solves several problems:
1/ outbuf[1] was written to, but not outbuf[0], which was left
uninitialized (well, SECURE_ESCAPE_ARGS() already fixes this, but do it
explicitly as well); we know it is safe to write one byte to outbuf,
because SECURE_ESCAPE_ARGS() guarantees it.
2/ If bytes was 1, the write to outbuf[1] was an off-by-one overflow.
3/ Do not call escape_str() with a 0 bufsize if bytes == overhead.
4/ Prevent various buffer overflows if bytes <= overhead.
Simply rearrange the old comparisons. The new comparisons are safe,
because we know from previous checks that:
1/ wlen > 0
2/ my_cells < *maxcells (also: my_cells >= 0 and *maxcells > 0)
3/ len > 1
4/ my_bytes+1 < bufsize (also: my_bytes >= 0 and bufsize > 0)
This should never happen, because wcwidth() is called only if iswprint()
returns nonzero. But belt-and-suspenders, and make it visually clear
(very important for the next patch).
The SECURE_ESCAPE_ARGS() macro solves several potential problems
(although we found no problematic calls to the escape*() functions in
procps's code-base, but had to thoroughly review every call; and this is
library code):
1/ off-by-one overflows if the size of the destination buffer is 0;
2/ buffer overflows if this size (or "maxroom") is negative;
3/ integer overflows (for example, "*maxcells+1");
4/ always null-terminate the destination buffer (unless its size is 0).
In the human_readable case; otherwise the strcat() that follows may
append bytes to the previous contents of buf.
Also, slightly enlarge buf, as it was a bit too tight.
Could also replace all sprintf()s with snprintf()s, but all the calls
here output a limited number of characters, so they should be safe.
Especially its "next" member: this is what caused the crash in "slabtop:
Reset slab_list if get_slabinfo() fails." (if parse_slabinfo*() fails in
sscanf(), for example, then curr is set to NULL but it is already linked
into the "list" and its "next" member was never initialized).
In proc/slab.c, functions parse_slabinfo20() and parse_slabinfo11(),
sscanf() might overflow curr->name, because "String input conversions
store a terminating null byte ('\0') to mark the end of the input; the
maximum field width does not include this terminator."
Add one byte to name[] for this terminator.
Otherwise this can truncate sizes on 64-bit platforms, and is one of the
reasons the integer overflows in file2strvec() are exploitable at all.
Also: catch potential integer overflow in xstrdup() (should never
happen, but better safe than sorry), and use memcpy() instead of
strcpy() (faster).
Warnings:
- in glibc, realloc(ptr, 0) is equivalent to free(ptr), but not here,
because of the ++size;
- here, xstrdup() can return NULL (if str is NULL), which goes against
the idea of the xalloc wrappers.
We were tempted to call exit() or xerrx() in those cases, but decided
against it, because it might break things in unexpected places; TODO?
This can disclose information from the stack, but is unlikely to have a
security impact in the context of the procps utilities:
user@debian:~$ w 2>&1 | xxd
00000000: a03c 79b7 1420 6661 696c 6564 2074 6f20 .<y.. failed to
00000010: 616c 6c6f 6361 7465 2033 3232 3137 3439 allocate 3221749
00000020: 3738 3020 6279 7465 7320 6f66 206d 656d 780 bytes of mem
00000030: 6f72 79 ory
Do not memleak "copy" in case of an error.
Do not use "sizeof(converted)" in snprintf(), since "converted" is a
"char *" (luckily, 8 >= sizeof(char *)). Also, remove "sizeof(char)"
which is guaranteed to be 1 by the C standard, and replace 8 with 12,
which is enough to hold any stringified int and does not consume more
memory (in both cases, the glibc malloc()ates a minimum-sized chunk).
Right now, if read() returns less than 127 bytes (the most likely case),
the end of the "string" buf will contain garbage from the stack, because
buf is always null-terminated at a fixed offset 127. This is especially
bad because the next operation is a strrchr().
Also, make sure that the whole /proc/PID/stat file is read, otherwise
its parsing may be unsafe (the strrchr() may point into user-controlled
data, comm). This should never happen with the current file format (comm
is very short), but be safe, just in case.
First problem: saved_argc was used to calculate the size of the array,
but saved_argc was never initialized. This triggers an immediate heap-
based buffer overflow:
$ skill -c0 -c0 -c0 -c0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Second problem: saved_argc was not the upper bound anyway, because one
argument can ENLIST() several times (for example, in parse_namespaces())
and overflow the array as well.
Third problem: integer overflow of the size of the array.
No need to "pid_count++;" because "ENLIST(pid," does it already. Right
now this can trigger a heap-based buffer overflow.
Also, remove the unneeded "pid_count = 0;" (it is static, and
skillsnice_parse() is called only once; and the other *_count variables
are not initialized explicitly either).
The memmove() itself does not move the NULL-terminator, because nargs is
decremented first. Copy how skill_sig_option() does it: decrement nargs
last, and remove the "if (nargs - i)" (we are in "while (i < nargs)").
man getline: "If *lineptr is set to NULL and *n is set 0 before the
call, then getline() will allocate a buffer for storing the line. This
buffer should be freed by the user program even if getline() failed."
Note: unlike "size" and "omit_size", "path_alloc_size" is not multiplied
by "sizeof(struct el)" but the checks in grow_size() allow for a roughly
100MB path_alloc_size, which should be more than enough for readlink().
Do it explicitly instead of the implicit "longjmp() cannot cause 0 to be
returned. If longjmp() is invoked with a second argument of 0, 1 will be
returned instead."
