When supplying the -p command to uptime, it does not display any
sections where the value is less than 1; however, after a reboot, this
causes the command to just output "up". Showing 0 minutes when the
system has been up for less than a minute makes it clear a reboot just
occurred.
References:
commit 325d68b7c3
Signed-off-by: Craig Small <csmall@enc.com.au>
procps_uptime, previously just plain uptime() used to put the
uptime (as a double) in the first argument and return uptime
(as an int).
It meant if you ran
myuptime2 = procps_uptime(&myuptime1, NULL);
You might get different results for myuptime1 and myuptime2 because
they are different types.
Most library calls use the return value to return the status,
procps_uptime was in the middle.
Until now.
This function will return 0 on success. If you want (for whatever
reason) uptime as an int then cast it.
All of the procps binaries didn't use the return value for uptime
except ps which set a variable to it but never used it anywhere.
[ but most definitely not all of them by a long shot ]
Reference(s):
proc/diskstat.c:186:17: warning: unused variable 'is_disk' [-Wunused-variable]
int retval, is_disk;
^
proc/namespace.c:110:1: warning: control may reach end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
proc/readproc.c:1131:50: warning: address of array 'ent->d_name' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bo
if(unlikely(unlikely(!ent) || unlikely(!ent->d_name))) return 0;
~~~~~~^~~~~~
proc/readproc.c:1158:50: warning: address of array 'ent->d_name' will always evaluate to 'true' [-Wpointer-bo
if(unlikely(unlikely(!ent) || unlikely(!ent->d_name))) return 0;
~~~~~~^~~~~~
proc/sysinfo.c:45:12: warning: unused variable 'stat_fd' [-Wunused-variable]
static int stat_fd = -1;
^
proc/sysinfo.c:49:12: warning: unused variable 'meminfo_fd' [-Wunused-variable]
static int meminfo_fd = -1;
^
proc/sysinfo.c:51:12: warning: unused variable 'vminfo_fd' [-Wunused-variable]
static int vminfo_fd = -1;
^
proc/sysinfo.c:53:12: warning: unused variable 'vm_min_free_fd' [-Wunused-variable]
static int vm_min_free_fd = -1;
^
proc/uptime.c:157:12: warning: unused variable 'realseconds' [-Wunused-variable]
time_t realseconds;
^
proc/uptime.c:158:16: warning: unused variable 'realtime' [-Wunused-variable]
struct tm *realtime;
^
vmstat.c:574:20: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned int' but the argument has type 'unsigned long' [-Wformat]
DSTAT(PROCPS_DISKSTAT_READ_TIME),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vmstat.c:578:20: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned int' but the argument has type 'unsigned long' [-Wformat]
DSTAT(PROCPS_DISKSTAT_WRITE_TIME),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
watch.c:230:7: warning: variable 'endptr' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
if (*endptr == '\0') set_ansi_attribute(0); /* [m treated as [0m */
^~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
Uptime output for both w and uptime command were showing no
comma or space after days.
$ ./uptime
18:32:21 up 22 days7 min, 6 users, load average: 0.23, 0.46, 0.64
Minor tweak to fix this.
The former whattime logic used to suppress that 'days'
output when the system had been up less than 24 hours.
But since the refactor for newlib, '0 days' was always
output under those conditions. So this commit restores
the former expected behavior of suppressing that item.
[ plus an erroneous calculation of uphours was fixed ]
[ and the clang warnings shown below were also fixed ]
Reference(s):
proc/uptime.c:74:10: warning: unused variable 'buf' [-Wunused-variable]
char buf[256];
^
proc/uptime.c:131:58: warning: data argument not used by format string [-Wformat-extra-args]
pos += sprintf(upbuf + pos, "%d min, ", uphours, upminutes);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
proc/uptime.c:175:15: warning: expression result unused [-Wunused-value]
comma +1;
~~~~~ ^~
Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
Removed the printf_uptime, binaries can do printf easily enough.
sprint_uptime split into two as there wasn't a lot of common
code
sprint_uptime(): old style uptime line
sprint_uptime_short(): short new style "uptime -p"
Hertz_hack needed this, no sane system uses the code (I think)
so just assume 100 like we do in FreeBSD.
