The previous commit added all of slab into the cache value. The thing was is cached in this context is something you can get back and reclaim if under memory pressure. The problem was slab parameter includes both reclaimable and unreclaimable values which doesn't make sense in this context. This commit make cached only use the reclaimable component. References: http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/OmegaPhilxxxxxxxxxxxxx-Bug799716-free-considers-cached-to-include-SUnreclaim https://github.com/brndnmtthws/conky/issues/130 https://bugs.debian.org/799716 Commits: 05d751c4f0 6cb75efef8
05d751c4f0
6cb75efef8