emo/thin-provisioning-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[block_t] a superblock_zero test was mistakenly calling plain write_lock.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Joe Thornber 2013-04-29 12:05:55 +01:00
parent 1fe0df9f1a
commit a0f53f47aa
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
unit-tests/block_t.cc
View File

@ -392,13 +392,13 @@ TEST_F(ValidatorTests, validator_can_be_changed_by_superblock_zero)
{ {
expect_no_check(vmock); expect_no_check(vmock);
expect_prepare(vmock); expect_prepare(vmock);
bm4096::write_ref wr = bm->write_lock(0, vmock); bm4096::write_ref wr = bm->superblock_zero(0, vmock);
} }
expect_no_check(vmock2); expect_no_check(vmock2);
expect_prepare(vmock2); expect_prepare(vmock2);
bm4096::write_ref wr = bm->write_lock(0, vmock2); bm4096::write_ref wr = bm->superblock_zero(0, vmock2);
} }
//---------------------------------------------------------------- //----------------------------------------------------------------