unlzma: fix erroneous "while" instead of "if". Closes 4682
These parts of the code essentially check whether stepping back by rep0 goes negative or not. LZMA SDK from lzma1604.7z has the following in the corresponding places: ... = dic[dicPos - rep0 + (dicPos < rep0 ? dicBufSize : 0)] Clearly, not loop here. Technically, "while" here works: if condition is false (because pos underflowed), it iterates once, adds header.dict_size (a.k.a. dicBufSize), this makes pos positive but smaller than header.dict_size, and loop exits. Now we'll just check for negative result of subtraction, which is less code: function old new delta unpack_lzma_stream 2659 2641 -18 (I hope 2 Gbyte+ dictionaries won't be in use soon). Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c1d857d25
commit
3989e5adf4
@ -278,9 +278,10 @@ unpack_lzma_stream(transformer_state_t *xstate)
|
||||
|
||||
if (state >= LZMA_NUM_LIT_STATES) {
|
||||
int match_byte;
|
||||
uint32_t pos = buffer_pos - rep0;
|
||||
uint32_t pos;
|
||||
|
||||
while (pos >= header.dict_size)
|
||||
pos = buffer_pos - rep0;
|
||||
if ((int32_t)pos < 0)
|
||||
pos += header.dict_size;
|
||||
match_byte = buffer[pos];
|
||||
do {
|
||||
@ -336,9 +337,11 @@ unpack_lzma_stream(transformer_state_t *xstate)
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (!rc_is_bit_1(rc, prob2)) {
|
||||
#if ENABLE_FEATURE_LZMA_FAST
|
||||
uint32_t pos = buffer_pos - rep0;
|
||||
uint32_t pos;
|
||||
state = state < LZMA_NUM_LIT_STATES ? 9 : 11;
|
||||
while (pos >= header.dict_size)
|
||||
|
||||
pos = buffer_pos - rep0;
|
||||
if ((int32_t)pos < 0)
|
||||
pos += header.dict_size;
|
||||
previous_byte = buffer[pos];
|
||||
goto one_byte1;
|
||||
@ -432,7 +435,7 @@ unpack_lzma_stream(transformer_state_t *xstate)
|
||||
IF_NOT_FEATURE_LZMA_FAST(string:)
|
||||
do {
|
||||
uint32_t pos = buffer_pos - rep0;
|
||||
while (pos >= header.dict_size)
|
||||
if ((int32_t)pos < 0)
|
||||
pos += header.dict_size;
|
||||
previous_byte = buffer[pos];
|
||||
IF_NOT_FEATURE_LZMA_FAST(one_byte2:)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user