gcc 11.2.1 complains that the tar header checksum might overflow
the checksum field. It won't and using an unsigned int for the
calculation seems to convince the compiler too.
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
A user noted that the following command was slower than they
expected:
busybox shuf -i "1500000000-$(date +%s)" -n 5
At time of writing the range contains 128 million values. On my
system this takes 7.7s whereas 'shuf' from coreutils takes a
handful of milliseconds.
Optimise BusyBox 'shuf' for cases where -n is specified by stopping
shuffling once the required number of lines have been processed.
On my system the time for the example is reduced to 0.4s.
function old new delta
shuf_main 520 540 +20
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 20/0) Total: 20 bytes
v2: Code shrink. Since outlines <= numlines:
- the loop in shuffle_lines() only needs to test the value of
outlines;
- shuffle_lines() can be called unconditionally.
Update timing to allow for the 13 million seconds elapsed since v1.
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Simplify the function print_literal() which is used to format a
string that may contain unprintable characters or control
characters.
- Unprintable characters were being displayed in normal text rather
than the bold used for the rest of the message. This doesn't seem
particularly helpful and it upsets the calculation of the width
of the message in show_status_line(). Use '?' rather than '.' for
unprintable characters.
- Newlines in the string were displayed as both '^J' and '$', which
is somewhat redundant.
function old new delta
not_implemented 199 108 -91
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-91) Total: -91 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
The '/' and '?' search commands wrap to the other end of the buffer
if the search target isn't found. When searches are used to specify
addresses in colon commands they should do the same.
(In traditional vi and vim this behaviour is controlled by the
'wrapscan' option. BusyBox vi doesn't have this option and always
uses the default behaviour.)
function old new delta
colon 4033 4077 +44
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 44/0) Total: 44 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
The input buffer is initialised to a reasonable size and extended
if necessary. When this happened the offset into the buffer wasn't
reset to zero so subsequent lines were appended to the long line.
Fix this and add some tests.
function old new delta
rev_main 377 368 -9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-9) Total: -9 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Run initialisation commands from ~/.exrc. As with EXINIT these
commands are processed before the first file is loaded.
Commands starting with double quotes are ignored. This is how
comments are often included in .exrc.
function old new delta
vi_main 268 406 +138
colon 4033 4071 +38
.rodata 108411 108442 +31
packed_usage 34128 34118 -10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 3/1 up/down: 207/-10) Total: 197 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Rewrite handling of command line arguments so any number of -c
commands will be processed. Previously only two -c commands
were allowed (or one if EXINIT was set).
Process commands from EXINIT before the first file is read into
memory, as specified by POSIX.
function old new delta
run_cmds - 77 +77
.rodata 108410 108411 +1
vi_main 305 268 -37
edit_file 816 764 -52
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 1/2 up/down: 78/-89) Total: -11 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
When long options were disabled cp failed to compile with:
coreutils/cp.c:130:9: error: empty enum is invalid
130 | };
| ^
Rearrange the conditional compilation to suit.
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
When excluding one file, and including another file that is a hardlink
of the excluded file, it should be stored as an ordinary file.
function old new delta
writeFileToTarball 489 493 +4
Signed-off-by: Harald van Dijk <harald@gigawatt.nl>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
'; BEGIN {...}' and 'BEGIN {...} ;; {...}' are not accepted by gawk
function old new delta
parse_program 332 353 +21
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Building with FEATURE_VI_REGEX_SEARCH enabled fails.
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
When regular expressions are allowed in search commands it becomes
possible to escape the delimiter in search/replace commands. For
example, this command will replace '/abc' with '/abc/':
:s/\/abc/\/abc\//g
The code to split the command into 'find' and 'replace' strings
should allow for this possibility.
VI_REGEX_SEARCH isn't enabled by default. When it is:
function old new delta
strchr_backslash - 38 +38
colon 4378 4373 -5
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 38/-5) Total: 33 bytes
Signed-off-by: Ron Yorston <rmy@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
