By the time we reach exit in parent, child already exited or execed.
We should not re-run libc cleanup code.
While at it, introduce bb_daemon_helper() and add a few comments.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
The applets with "<applet> [opts] PROG ARGS" API very quickly exec
another program, noexec is okay for them:
chpst/envdir/envuidgid/softlimit/setuidgid
chroot
chrt
ionice
nice
nohup
setarch/linux32/linux64
taskset
cttyhack
"reset" and "sulogin" applets don't have this form, but also exec
another program at once, thus made noexec too.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Noticed while auditing nofork/noexec status
function old new delta
pmap_main 70 80 +10
packed_usage 31747 31744 -3
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Noticed while auditing nofork/noexec status
function old new delta
packed_usage 31777 31747 -30
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Based on patch by Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
function old new delta
evalcommand 1447 1500 +53
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
As of 035486c75 (ash: significant overhaul of redirect saving logic,
2017-07-31), the sv_pos variable is no longer used (just assigned to,
with no further effect).
Let's just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
$ echo $$
18448
$ echo $? <wait here, run "kill -INT 18448" in other shell><press enter>
<=== NOTHING??
$
That empty line does not look right. After this patch:
$ echo $$
18448
$ echo $? <wait here, run "kill -INT 18448" in other shell><press enter>
^C
$
function old new delta
fgetc_interactive 245 246 +1
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
"rm -i FILE" and "yes" can now be interrupted by ^C in hush.
This also now works:
$ usleep 19999999
^C
$ echo $?
130
function old new delta
run_pipe 1668 1711 +43
pseudo_exec_argv 312 321 +9
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/0 up/down: 52/0) Total: 52 bytes
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Upstream commit:
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:34:50 +0800
[OPTIONS] Added support for -l
This patch adds support for the -l option (login shell) as required
by the LSB.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
It's a bit bigger, but gets rid of one global variable
function old new delta
options 554 576 +22
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Upstream dash commit:
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 19:20:10 +0800
Fixed 3,4-argument cases for test per POSIX
----- Forwarded message from Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org> -----
Subject: Bug#455828: dash: 4-argument test "test \( ! -e \)" yields an error
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:53:29 +0000
From: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
To: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.org>, 455828@bugs.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:23:20PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2007-12-27 16:00:06 +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 02:18:47AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > According to POSIX[*], "test \( ! -e \)" is a 4-argument test and is
> > > here equivalent to "test ! -e". But dash (like ksh93 and bash) yields
> > > an error:
> > >
> > > $ test \( ! -e \) || echo $?
> > > test: 1: closing paren expected
> > > 2
> > > $ test ! -e || echo $?
> > > 1
> >
> > Hi Vincent,
> >
> > the -e switch to test takes an argument, a pathname.
>
> According to POSIX, in both above examples, "-e" is *not* a switch,
> just a string.
>
> test \( ! -e \)
>
> means: return true if the string "-e" is empty, otherwhise return false.
> The error in dash is that it incorrectly thinks that "-e" is a switch in
> this context.
I see, you're right. Thanks, Gerrit.
----- End forwarded message -----
This patch hard-codes the 3,4-argument cases in the way required by
POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
function old new delta
test_main 370 421 +51
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
