library: added some justification emphasis, <pids> api
I almost feel like I should apologize for this kind of patch ( *almost* ). But, since this comment was unique to the <pids> api and since it was especially designed to align with the following comment and since the next comment already carried the alignment emphasis, I will refrain from issuing any apology and submit it anyway. [ plus to prove that i am not totally anal-retentive ] [ and can exercise some restraint there are two more ] [ places where i COULD have added alignment emphasis ] [ see lines 804-806 and lines 1360-1361 for my proof ] Signed-off-by: Jim Warner <james.warner@comcast.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b117b67a52
commit
c13ea57495
@ -1069,9 +1069,9 @@ static int pids_stacks_fetch (
|
|||||||
if (!pids_assign_results(info, info->fetch.anchor[n_inuse++], &task))
|
if (!pids_assign_results(info, info->fetch.anchor[n_inuse++], &task))
|
||||||
return -1; // here, errno was set to ENOMEM
|
return -1; // here, errno was set to ENOMEM
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* while the possibility is extremely remote, the readproc.c (read_something)
|
/* while the possibility is extremely remote, the readproc.c (read_something) |
|
||||||
simple_readproc and simple_readtask guys could have encountered this error
|
simple_readproc and simple_readtask guys could have encountered this error |
|
||||||
in which case they would have returned a NULL, thus ending our while loop. */
|
in which case they would have returned a NULL, thus ending our while loop. | */
|
||||||
if (errno == ENOMEM)
|
if (errno == ENOMEM)
|
||||||
return -1;
|
return -1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user