2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
# Hardened malloc
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-17 05:05:19 +05:30
|
|
|
This is a security-focused general purpose memory allocator providing the
|
|
|
|
malloc API along with various extensions. It provides substantial hardening
|
|
|
|
against heap corruption vulnerabilities. The security-focused design also leads
|
|
|
|
to much less metadata overhead and memory waste from fragmentation than a more
|
|
|
|
traditional allocator design. It aims to provide decent overall performance
|
|
|
|
with a focus on long-term performance and memory usage rather than allocator
|
2019-03-26 01:44:54 +05:30
|
|
|
micro-benchmarks. It offers scalability via a configurable number of entirely
|
|
|
|
independently arenas, with the internal locking within arenas further divided
|
|
|
|
up per size class.
|
2018-11-17 05:05:19 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-09-02 15:35:37 +05:30
|
|
|
This project currently aims to support Android, musl and glibc. It may support
|
|
|
|
other non-Linux operating systems in the future. For Android and musl, there
|
|
|
|
will be custom integration and other hardening features. The glibc support will
|
|
|
|
be limited to replacing the malloc implementation because musl is a much more
|
|
|
|
robust and cleaner base to build on and can cover the same use cases.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-19 11:32:40 +05:30
|
|
|
This allocator is intended as a successor to a previous implementation based on
|
|
|
|
extending OpenBSD malloc with various additional security features. It's still
|
2018-11-19 16:14:56 +05:30
|
|
|
heavily based on the OpenBSD malloc design, albeit not on the existing code
|
|
|
|
other than reusing the hash table implementation for the time being. The main
|
2018-11-19 18:34:37 +05:30
|
|
|
differences in the design are that it is solely focused on hardening rather
|
|
|
|
than finding bugs, uses finer-grained size classes along with slab sizes going
|
|
|
|
beyond 4k to reduce internal fragmentation, doesn't rely on the kernel having
|
|
|
|
fine-grained mmap randomization and only targets 64-bit to make aggressive use
|
|
|
|
of the large address space. There are lots of smaller differences in the
|
|
|
|
implementation approach. It incorporates the previous extensions made to
|
|
|
|
OpenBSD malloc including adding padding to allocations for canaries (distinct
|
|
|
|
from the current OpenBSD malloc canaries), write-after-free detection tied to
|
|
|
|
the existing clearing on free, queues alongside the existing randomized arrays
|
|
|
|
for quarantining allocations and proper double-free detection for quarantined
|
2018-11-19 11:32:40 +05:30
|
|
|
allocations. The per-size-class memory regions with their own random bases were
|
|
|
|
loosely inspired by the size and type-based partitioning in PartitionAlloc. The
|
|
|
|
planned changes to OpenBSD malloc ended up being too extensive and invasive so
|
|
|
|
this project was started as a fresh implementation better able to accomplish
|
|
|
|
the goals. For 32-bit, a port of OpenBSD malloc with small extensions can be
|
|
|
|
used instead as this allocator fundamentally doesn't support that environment.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Dependencies
|
2018-11-17 05:11:27 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-08-25 04:28:55 +05:30
|
|
|
Debian stable determines the most ancient set of supported dependencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* glibc 2.24
|
|
|
|
* Linux 4.9
|
|
|
|
* Clang 3.8 or GCC 6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, using more recent releases is highly recommended. Older versions of
|
|
|
|
the dependencies may be compatible at the moment but are not tested and will
|
|
|
|
explicitly not be supported.
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-09-07 05:22:09 +05:30
|
|
|
For external malloc replacement with musl, musl 1.1.20 is required. However,
|
|
|
|
there will be custom integration offering better performance in the future
|
|
|
|
along with other hardening for the C standard library implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-02 15:35:37 +05:30
|
|
|
Major releases of Android will be supported until tags stop being pushed to
|
|
|
|
the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). Google supports each major release
|
|
|
|
with security patches for 3 years, but tagged releases of the Android Open
|
|
|
|
Source Project are more than just security patches and are no longer pushed
|
|
|
|
once no officially supported devices are using them anymore. For example, at
|
|
|
|
the time of writing (September 2018), AOSP only has tagged releases for 8.1
|
2019-01-03 01:57:51 +05:30
|
|
|
(Nexus 5X, Nexus 6P, Pixel C) and 9.0 (Pixel, Pixel XL, Pixel 2, Pixel 2 XL).
|
2018-09-02 15:35:37 +05:30
|
|
|
There are ongoing security patches for 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2, 8.0, 8.1
|
|
|
|
and 9.0 but only the active AOSP branches (8.1 and 9.0) are supported by this
|
|
|
|
project and it doesn't make much sense to use much older releases with far
|
|
|
|
less privacy and security hardening.
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Testing
|
2018-10-04 12:57:30 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `preload.sh` script can be used for testing with dynamically linked
|
|
|
|
executables using glibc or musl:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
./preload.sh krita --new-image RGBA,U8,500,500
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-04 13:14:19 +05:30
|
|
|
It can be necessary to substantially increase the `vm.max_map_count` sysctl to
|
|
|
|
accomodate the large number of mappings caused by guard slabs and large
|
2018-11-17 04:34:46 +05:30
|
|
|
allocation guard regions. The number of mappings can also be drastically
|
|
|
|
reduced via a significant increase to `CONFIG_GUARD_SLABS_INTERVAL` but the
|
|
|
|
feature has a low performance and memory usage cost so that isn't recommended.
|
2018-10-04 13:14:19 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-10-04 12:57:30 +05:30
|
|
|
It can offer slightly better performance when integrated into the C standard
|
|
|
|
library and there are other opportunities for similar hardening within C
|
|
|
|
standard library and dynamic linker implementations. For example, a library
|
|
|
|
region can be implemented to offer similar isolation for dynamic libraries as
|
|
|
|
this allocator offers across different size classes. The intention is that this
|
|
|
|
will be offered as part of hardened variants of the Bionic and musl C standard
|
|
|
|
libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Configuration
|
2018-10-04 12:45:55 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-09-19 23:27:35 +05:30
|
|
|
You can set some configuration options at compile-time via arguments to the
|
|
|
|
make command as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
make CONFIG_EXAMPLE=false
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-03 07:05:09 +05:30
|
|
|
Configuration options are provided when there are significant compromises
|
2018-11-17 05:05:19 +05:30
|
|
|
between portability, performance, memory usage or security. The core design
|
|
|
|
choices are not configurable and the allocator remains very security-focused
|
|
|
|
even with all the optional features disabled.
|
2018-11-17 02:06:34 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following boolean configuration options are available:
|
2018-09-19 23:27:35 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-10-29 08:01:46 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_NATIVE`: `true` (default) or `false` to control whether the code is
|
|
|
|
optimized for the detected CPU on the host. If this is disabled, setting up a
|
|
|
|
custom `-march` higher than the baseline architecture is highly recommended
|
|
|
|
due to substantial performance benefits for this code.
|
2018-09-19 23:27:35 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_CXX_ALLOCATOR`: `true` (default) or `false` to control whether the
|
2018-10-19 00:27:05 +05:30
|
|
|
C++ allocator is replaced for slightly improved performance and detection of
|
|
|
|
mismatched sizes for sized deallocation (often type confusion bugs). This
|
|
|
|
will result in linking against the C++ standard library.
|
2018-11-03 07:05:09 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_ZERO_ON_FREE`: `true` (default) or `false` to control whether small
|
|
|
|
allocations are zeroed on free, to mitigate use-after-free and uninitialized
|
|
|
|
use vulnerabilities along with purging lots of potentially sensitive data
|
|
|
|
from the process as soon as possible. This has a performance cost scaling to
|
|
|
|
the size of the allocation, which is usually acceptable.
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_WRITE_AFTER_FREE_CHECK`: `true` (default) or `false` to control
|
|
|
|
sanity checking that new allocations contain zeroed memory. This can detect
|
|
|
|
writes caused by a write-after-free vulnerability and mixes well with the
|
|
|
|
features for making memory reuse randomized / delayed. This has a performance
|
|
|
|
cost scaling to the size of the allocation, which is usually acceptable.
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_SLOT_RANDOMIZE`: `true` (default) or `false` to randomize selection
|
|
|
|
of free slots within slabs. This has a measurable performance cost and isn't
|
|
|
|
one of the important security features, but the cost has been deemed more
|
|
|
|
than acceptable to be enabled by default.
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_SLAB_CANARY`: `true` (default) or `false` to enable support for
|
|
|
|
adding 8 byte canaries to the end of memory allocations. The primary purpose
|
|
|
|
of the canaries is to render small fixed size buffer overflows harmless by
|
|
|
|
absorbing them. The first byte of the canary is always zero, containing
|
|
|
|
overflows caused by a missing C string NUL terminator. The other 7 bytes are
|
|
|
|
a per-slab random value. On free, integrity of the canary is checked to
|
|
|
|
detect attacks like linear overflows or other forms of heap corruption caused
|
|
|
|
by imprecise exploit primitives. However, checking on free will often be too
|
|
|
|
late to prevent exploitation so it's not the main purpose of the canaries.
|
2018-10-20 06:59:40 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_SEAL_METADATA`: `true` or `false` (default) to control whether Memory
|
|
|
|
Protection Keys are used to disable access to all writable allocator state
|
|
|
|
outside of the memory allocator code. It's currently disabled by default due
|
2018-10-24 05:08:00 +05:30
|
|
|
to being extremely experimental and a significant performance cost for this
|
|
|
|
use case on current generation hardware, which may become drastically lower
|
2018-10-29 05:58:10 +05:30
|
|
|
in the future. Whether or not this feature is enabled, the metadata is all
|
|
|
|
contained within an isolated memory region with high entropy random guard
|
|
|
|
regions around it.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-11-17 02:06:34 +05:30
|
|
|
The following integer configuration options are available. Proper sanity checks
|
|
|
|
for the chosen values are not written yet, so use them at your own peril:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-03 02:12:41 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_SLAB_QUARANTINE_RANDOM_LENGTH`: `1` (default) to control the number
|
2019-01-03 00:10:02 +05:30
|
|
|
of slots in the random array used to randomize reuse for small memory
|
2019-01-03 00:52:28 +05:30
|
|
|
allocations. This sets the length for the largest size class (currently
|
|
|
|
16384) and the quarantine length for smaller size classes is scaled to match
|
2019-01-03 02:12:41 +05:30
|
|
|
the total memory of the quarantined allocations (1 becomes 1024 for 16 byte
|
|
|
|
allocations).
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_SLAB_QUARANTINE_QUEUE_LENGTH`: `1` (default) to control the number of
|
2019-01-03 00:52:28 +05:30
|
|
|
slots in the queue used to delay reuse for small memory allocations. This
|
|
|
|
sets the length for the largest size class (currently 16384) and the
|
|
|
|
quarantine length for smaller size classes is scaled to match the total
|
2019-01-03 02:12:41 +05:30
|
|
|
memory of the quarantined allocations (1 becomes 1024 for 16 byte
|
|
|
|
allocations).
|
2018-11-17 02:06:34 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_GUARD_SLABS_INTERVAL`: `1` (default) to control the number of slabs
|
|
|
|
before a slab is skipped and left as an unused memory protected guard slab
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_GUARD_SIZE_DIVISOR`: `2` (default) to control the maximum size of the
|
|
|
|
guard regions placed on both sides of large memory allocations, relative to
|
|
|
|
the usable size of the memory allocation
|
2019-01-03 00:10:02 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_REGION_QUARANTINE_RANDOM_LENGTH`: `128` (default) to control the
|
|
|
|
number of slots in the random array used to randomize region reuse for large
|
|
|
|
memory allocations
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_REGION_QUARANTINE_QUEUE_LENGTH`: `1024` (default) to control the
|
|
|
|
number of slots in the queue used to delay region reuse for large memory
|
2018-11-17 02:06:34 +05:30
|
|
|
allocations
|
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_REGION_QUARANTINE_SKIP_THRESHOLD`: `33554432` (default) to control
|
|
|
|
the size threshold where large allocations will not be quarantined
|
2019-01-03 00:10:02 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_FREE_SLABS_QUARANTINE_RANDOM_LENGTH`: `32` (default) to control the
|
2018-11-17 02:06:34 +05:30
|
|
|
number of slots in the random array used to randomize free slab reuse
|
2018-12-05 19:53:05 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_CLASS_REGION_SIZE`: `34359738368` (default) to control the size of
|
|
|
|
the size class regions
|
2019-03-26 00:19:50 +05:30
|
|
|
* `CONFIG_N_ARENA`: `1` (default) to control the number of arenas
|
2018-10-04 12:45:55 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There will be more control over enabled features in the future along with
|
|
|
|
control over fairly arbitrarily chosen values like the size of empty slab
|
2018-11-03 14:17:45 +05:30
|
|
|
caches (making them smaller improves security and reduces memory usage while
|
|
|
|
larger caches can substantially improves performance).
|
2018-10-04 12:45:55 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Basic design
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current design is very simple and will become a bit more sophisticated as
|
|
|
|
the basic features are completed and the implementation is hardened and
|
|
|
|
optimized. The allocator is exclusive to 64-bit platforms in order to take full
|
|
|
|
advantage of the abundant address space without being constrained by needing to
|
|
|
|
keep the design compatible with 32-bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small allocations are always located in a large memory region reserved for slab
|
|
|
|
allocations. It can be determined that an allocation is one of the small size
|
|
|
|
classes from the address range. Each small size class has a separate reserved
|
|
|
|
region within the larger region, and the size of a small allocation can simply
|
|
|
|
be determined from the range. Each small size class has a separate out-of-line
|
|
|
|
metadata array outside of the overall allocation region, with the index of the
|
|
|
|
metadata struct within the array mapping to the index of the slab within the
|
|
|
|
dedicated size class region. Slabs are a multiple of the page size and are
|
2018-10-04 13:42:21 +05:30
|
|
|
page aligned. The entire small size class region starts out memory protected
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
and becomes readable / writable as it gets allocated, with idle slabs beyond
|
|
|
|
the cache limit having their pages dropped and the memory protected again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large allocations are tracked via a global hash table mapping their address to
|
|
|
|
their size and guard size. They're simply memory mappings and get mapped on
|
|
|
|
allocation and then unmapped on free.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-15 13:34:51 +05:30
|
|
|
This allocator is aimed at production usage, not aiding with finding and fixing
|
|
|
|
memory corruption bugs for software development. It does find many latent bugs
|
|
|
|
but won't include features like the option of generating and storing stack
|
|
|
|
traces for each allocation to include the allocation site in related error
|
|
|
|
messages. The design choices are based around minimizing overhead and
|
|
|
|
maximizing security which often leads to different decisions than a tool
|
|
|
|
attempting to find bugs. For example, it uses zero-based sanitization on free
|
|
|
|
and doesn't minimize slack space from size class rounding between the end of an
|
|
|
|
allocation and the canary / guard region. Zero-based filling has the least
|
|
|
|
chance of uncovering latent bugs, but also the best chance of mitigating
|
|
|
|
vulnerabilities. The canary feature is primarily meant to act as padding
|
|
|
|
absorbing small overflows to render them harmless, so slack space is helpful
|
|
|
|
rather than harmful despite not detecting the corruption on free. The canary
|
|
|
|
needs detection on free in order to have any hope of stopping other kinds of
|
|
|
|
issues like a sequential overflow, which is why it's included. It's assumed
|
|
|
|
that an attacker can figure out the allocator is in use so the focus is
|
|
|
|
explicitly not on detecting bugs that are impossible to exploit with it in use
|
|
|
|
like an 8 byte overflow. The design choices would be different if performance
|
|
|
|
was a bit less important and if a core goal was finding latent bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Security properties
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Fully out-of-line metadata
|
|
|
|
* Deterministic detection of any invalid free (unallocated, unaligned, etc.)
|
2018-10-11 04:18:45 +05:30
|
|
|
* Validation of the size passed for C++14 sized deallocation by `delete`
|
2018-11-05 05:22:01 +05:30
|
|
|
even for code compiled with earlier standards (detects type confusion if
|
|
|
|
the size is different) and by various containers using the allocator API
|
|
|
|
directly
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
* Isolated memory region for slab allocations
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
* Divided up into isolated inner regions for each size class
|
|
|
|
* High entropy random base for each size class region
|
|
|
|
* No deterministic / low entropy offsets between allocations with
|
|
|
|
different size classes
|
2018-08-26 16:41:22 +05:30
|
|
|
* Metadata is completely outside the slab allocation region
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
* No references to metadata within the slab allocation region
|
|
|
|
* No deterministic / low entropy offsets to metadata
|
|
|
|
* Entire slab region starts out non-readable and non-writable
|
|
|
|
* Slabs beyond the cache limit are purged and become non-readable and
|
|
|
|
non-writable memory again
|
2018-10-15 07:49:10 +05:30
|
|
|
* Placed into a queue for reuse in FIFO order to maximize the time
|
|
|
|
spent memory protected
|
|
|
|
* Randomized array is used to add a random delay for reuse
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
* Fine-grained randomization within memory regions
|
|
|
|
* Randomly sized guard regions for large allocations
|
|
|
|
* Random slot selection within slabs
|
2018-11-06 02:49:50 +05:30
|
|
|
* Randomized delayed free for slab allocations
|
2018-11-06 04:36:54 +05:30
|
|
|
* [in-progress] Randomized choice of slabs
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
* [in-progress] Randomized allocation of slabs
|
2018-10-09 01:20:31 +05:30
|
|
|
* Slab allocations are zeroed on free
|
2018-11-16 13:56:07 +05:30
|
|
|
* Detection of write-after-free for slab allocations by verifying zero filling
|
|
|
|
is intact at allocation time
|
2018-10-09 01:20:31 +05:30
|
|
|
* Large allocations are purged and memory protected on free with the memory
|
|
|
|
mapping kept reserved in a quarantine to detect use-after-free
|
2018-10-13 00:40:35 +05:30
|
|
|
* The quarantine is primarily based on a FIFO ring buffer, with the oldest
|
|
|
|
mapping in the quarantine being unmapped to make room for the most
|
|
|
|
recently freed mapping
|
|
|
|
* Another layer of the quarantine swaps with a random slot in an array to
|
|
|
|
randomize the number of large deallocations required to push mappings out
|
|
|
|
of the quarantine
|
2018-08-27 10:44:15 +05:30
|
|
|
* Memory in fresh allocations is consistently zeroed due to it either being
|
|
|
|
fresh pages or zeroed on free after previous usage
|
2018-11-06 02:49:50 +05:30
|
|
|
* Delayed free via a combination of FIFO and randomization for slab allocations
|
2018-09-05 09:49:27 +05:30
|
|
|
* Random canaries placed after each slab allocation to *absorb*
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
and then later detect overflows/underflows
|
|
|
|
* High entropy per-slab random values
|
2018-10-04 02:39:57 +05:30
|
|
|
* Leading byte is zeroed to contain C string overflows
|
2018-09-07 04:23:06 +05:30
|
|
|
* Possible slab locations are skipped and remain memory protected, leaving slab
|
|
|
|
size class regions interspersed with guard pages
|
2018-11-03 14:10:13 +05:30
|
|
|
* Zero size allocations are a dedicated size class with the entire region
|
|
|
|
remaining non-readable and non-writable
|
2018-10-15 07:42:03 +05:30
|
|
|
* Protected allocator state (including all metadata)
|
|
|
|
* Address space for state is entirely reserved during initialization and
|
2018-10-11 04:25:31 +05:30
|
|
|
never reused for allocations or anything else
|
2018-10-15 07:42:03 +05:30
|
|
|
* State within global variables is entirely read-only after initialization
|
|
|
|
with pointers to the isolated allocator state so leaking the address of
|
|
|
|
the library doesn't leak the address of writable state
|
2018-10-19 01:40:49 +05:30
|
|
|
* Allocator state is located within a dedicated region with high entropy
|
|
|
|
randomly sized guard regions around it
|
2018-11-03 12:41:59 +05:30
|
|
|
* Protection via Memory Protection Keys (MPK) on x86\_64 (disabled by
|
|
|
|
default due to low benefit-cost ratio on top of baseline protections)
|
2018-10-19 06:03:48 +05:30
|
|
|
* [future] Protection via MTE on ARMv8.5+
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
* Extension for retrieving the size of allocations with fallback
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
to a sentinel for pointers not managed by the allocator
|
|
|
|
* Can also return accurate values for pointers *within* small allocations
|
|
|
|
* The same applies to pointers within the first page of large allocations,
|
|
|
|
otherwise it currently has to return a sentinel
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
* No alignment tricks interfering with ASLR like jemalloc, PartitionAlloc, etc.
|
|
|
|
* No usage of the legacy brk heap
|
|
|
|
* Aggressive sanity checks
|
|
|
|
* Errors other than ENOMEM from mmap, munmap, mprotect and mremap treated
|
2018-10-04 02:53:20 +05:30
|
|
|
as fatal, which can help to detect memory management gone wrong elsewhere
|
|
|
|
in the process.
|
2018-11-03 12:39:03 +05:30
|
|
|
* [future] Memory tagging for slab allocations via MTE on ARMv8.5+
|
|
|
|
* random memory tags as the baseline, providing probabilistic protection
|
|
|
|
against various forms of memory corruption
|
|
|
|
* dedicated tag for free slots, set on free, for deterministic protection
|
|
|
|
against accessing freed memory
|
|
|
|
* store previous random tag within freed slab allocations, and increment it
|
|
|
|
to get the next tag for that slot to provide deterministic use-after-free
|
|
|
|
detection through multiple cycles of memory reuse
|
|
|
|
* guarantee distinct tags for adjacent memory allocations by incrementing
|
|
|
|
past matching values for deterministic detection of linear overflows
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Randomness
|
2018-08-30 20:37:20 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current implementation of random number generation for randomization-based
|
|
|
|
mitigations is based on generating a keystream from a stream cipher (ChaCha8)
|
|
|
|
in small chunks. A separate CSPRNG is used for each small size class, large
|
|
|
|
allocations, etc. in order to fit into the existing fine-grained locking model
|
|
|
|
without needing to waste memory per thread by having the CSPRNG state in Thread
|
|
|
|
Local Storage. Similarly, it's protected via the same approach taken for the
|
|
|
|
rest of the metadata. The stream cipher is regularly reseeded from the OS to
|
|
|
|
provide backtracking and prediction resistance with a negligible cost. The
|
|
|
|
reseed interval simply needs to be adjusted to the point that it stops
|
|
|
|
registering as having any significant performance impact. The performance
|
|
|
|
impact on recent Linux kernels is primarily from the high cost of system calls
|
|
|
|
and locking since the implementation is quite efficient (ChaCha20), especially
|
|
|
|
for just generating the key and nonce for another stream cipher (ChaCha8).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChaCha8 is a great fit because it's extremely fast across platforms without
|
|
|
|
relying on hardware support or complex platform-specific code. The security
|
|
|
|
margins of ChaCha20 would be completely overkill for the use case. Using
|
|
|
|
ChaCha8 avoids needing to resort to a non-cryptographically secure PRNG or
|
|
|
|
something without a lot of scrunity. The current implementation is simply the
|
|
|
|
reference implementation of ChaCha8 converted into a pure keystream by ripping
|
|
|
|
out the XOR of the message into the keystream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The random range generation functions are a highly optimized implementation
|
|
|
|
too. Traditional uniform random number generation within a range is very high
|
|
|
|
overhead and can easily dwarf the cost of an efficient CSPRNG.
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Size classes
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-11-03 14:10:13 +05:30
|
|
|
The zero byte size class is a special case of the smallest regular size class.
|
|
|
|
It's allocated in a dedicated region like other size classes but with the slabs
|
|
|
|
never being made readable and writable so the only memory usage is for the slab
|
|
|
|
metadata.
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-11-19 10:41:15 +05:30
|
|
|
The choice of size classes for slab allocation is the same as jemalloc, which
|
|
|
|
is a careful balance between minimizing internal and external fragmentation. If
|
|
|
|
there are more size classes, more memory is wasted on free slots available only
|
|
|
|
to allocation requests of those sizes (external fragmentation). If there are
|
|
|
|
fewer size classes, the spacing between them is larger and more memory is
|
|
|
|
wasted due to rounding up to the size classes (internal fragmentation). There
|
|
|
|
are 4 special size classes for the smallest sizes (16, 32, 48, 64) that are
|
|
|
|
simply spaced out by the minimum spacing (16). Afterwards, there are four size
|
|
|
|
classes for every power of two spacing which results in bounding the internal
|
|
|
|
fragmentation below 20% for each size class. This also means there are 4 size
|
|
|
|
classes for each doubling in size.
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-11-19 10:47:43 +05:30
|
|
|
The slot counts tied to the size classes are specific to this allocator rather
|
|
|
|
than being taken from jemalloc. Slabs are always a span of pages so the slot
|
|
|
|
count needs to be tuned to minimize waste due to rounding to the page size. For
|
|
|
|
now, this allocator is set up only for 4096 byte pages as a small page size is
|
|
|
|
desirable for finer-grained memory protection and randomization. It could be
|
2018-11-19 12:14:46 +05:30
|
|
|
ported to larger page sizes in the future. The current slot counts are only a
|
|
|
|
preliminary set of values.
|
2018-11-19 10:47:43 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2018-11-03 15:14:49 +05:30
|
|
|
| size class | worst case internal fragmentation | slab slots | slab size | internal fragmentation for slabs |
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
| - | - | - | - | - |
|
2018-11-03 14:10:13 +05:30
|
|
|
| 16 | 93.75% | 256 | 4096 | 0.0% |
|
2018-08-26 15:53:24 +05:30
|
|
|
| 32 | 46.875% | 128 | 4096 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 48 | 31.25% | 85 | 4096 | 0.390625% |
|
|
|
|
| 64 | 23.4375% | 64 | 4096 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 80 | 18.75% | 51 | 4096 | 0.390625% |
|
|
|
|
| 96 | 15.625% | 42 | 4096 | 1.5625% |
|
|
|
|
| 112 | 13.392857142857139% | 36 | 4096 | 1.5625% |
|
|
|
|
| 128 | 11.71875% | 64 | 8192 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 160 | 19.375% | 51 | 8192 | 0.390625% |
|
|
|
|
| 192 | 16.145833333333343% | 64 | 12288 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 224 | 13.839285714285708% | 54 | 12288 | 1.5625% |
|
|
|
|
| 256 | 12.109375% | 64 | 16384 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 320 | 19.6875% | 64 | 20480 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 384 | 16.40625% | 64 | 24576 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 448 | 14.0625% | 64 | 28672 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 512 | 12.3046875% | 64 | 32768 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 640 | 19.84375% | 64 | 40960 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 768 | 16.536458333333343% | 64 | 49152 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 896 | 14.174107142857139% | 64 | 57344 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 1024 | 12.40234375% | 64 | 65536 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 1280 | 19.921875% | 16 | 20480 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 1536 | 16.6015625% | 16 | 24576 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 1792 | 14.229910714285708% | 16 | 28672 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 2048 | 12.451171875% | 16 | 32768 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 2560 | 19.9609375% | 8 | 20480 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 3072 | 16.634114583333343% | 8 | 24576 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 3584 | 14.2578125% | 8 | 28672 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 4096 | 12.4755859375% | 8 | 32768 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 5120 | 19.98046875% | 8 | 40960 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 6144 | 16.650390625% | 8 | 49152 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 7168 | 14.271763392857139% | 8 | 57344 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 8192 | 12.48779296875% | 8 | 65536 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 10240 | 19.990234375% | 6 | 61440 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 12288 | 16.658528645833343% | 5 | 61440 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 14336 | 14.278738839285708% | 4 | 57344 | 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
| 16384 | 12.493896484375% | 4 | 65536 | 0.0% |
|
2018-11-19 12:14:46 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The slab allocation size classes currently end at 16384 since that's the final
|
|
|
|
size for 2048 byte spacing and the next spacing class matches the page size of
|
|
|
|
4096 bytes on the target platforms. This is the minimum set of small size
|
|
|
|
classes required to avoid substantial waste from rounding. Further slab
|
|
|
|
allocation size classes may be offered as an option in the future.
|
2018-11-19 17:24:48 +05:30
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 01:31:15 +05:30
|
|
|
## Scalability
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 02:29:14 +05:30
|
|
|
### Small (slab) allocations
|
2019-02-05 01:31:15 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a baseline form of fine-grained locking, the slab allocator has entirely
|
|
|
|
separate allocators for each size class. Each size class has a dedicated lock,
|
|
|
|
CSPRNG and other state.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-03-26 01:44:54 +05:30
|
|
|
The slab allocator's scalability primarily comes from dividing up the slab
|
|
|
|
allocation region into independent arenas assigned to threads. The arenas are
|
|
|
|
just entirely separate slab allocators with their own sub-regions for each size
|
|
|
|
class. Using 4 arenas reserves a region 4 times as large and the relevant slab
|
|
|
|
allocator metadata is determined based on address, as part of the same approach
|
|
|
|
to finding the per-size-class metadata. The part that's still open to different
|
|
|
|
design choices is how arenas are assigned to threads. One approach is
|
|
|
|
statically assigning arenas via round-robin like the standard jemalloc
|
|
|
|
implementation, or statically assigning to a random arena which is essentially
|
|
|
|
the current implementation. Another option is dynamic load balancing via a
|
|
|
|
heuristic like `sched_getcpu` for per-CPU arenas, which would offer better
|
|
|
|
performance than randomly choosing an arena each time while being more
|
|
|
|
predictable for an attacker. There are actually some security benefits from
|
|
|
|
this assignment being completely static, since it isolates threads from each
|
|
|
|
other. Static assignment can also reduce memory usage since threads may have
|
|
|
|
varying usage of size classes.
|
2019-02-05 01:31:15 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When there's substantial allocation or deallocation pressure, the allocator
|
|
|
|
does end up calling into the kernel to purge / protect unused slabs by
|
|
|
|
replacing them with fresh `PROT_NONE` regions along with unprotecting slabs
|
|
|
|
when partially filled and cached empty slabs are depleted. There will be
|
|
|
|
configuration over the amount of cached empty slabs, but it's not entirely a
|
|
|
|
performance vs. memory trade-off since memory protecting unused slabs is a nice
|
|
|
|
opportunistic boost to security. However, it's not really part of the core
|
|
|
|
security model or features so it's quite reasonable to use much larger empty
|
|
|
|
slab caches when the memory usage is acceptable. It would also be reasonable to
|
|
|
|
attempt to use heuristics for dynamically tuning the size, but there's not a
|
|
|
|
great one size fits all approach so it isn't currently part of this allocator
|
|
|
|
implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 02:29:14 +05:30
|
|
|
#### Thread caching (or lack thereof)
|
2019-02-05 01:31:15 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread caches are a commonly implemented optimization in modern allocators but
|
|
|
|
aren't very suitable for a hardened allocator even when implemented via arrays
|
|
|
|
like jemalloc rather than free lists. They would prevent the allocator from
|
|
|
|
having perfect knowledge about which memory is free in a way that's both race
|
|
|
|
free and works with fully out-of-line metadata. It would also interfere with
|
|
|
|
the quality of fine-grained randomization even with randomization support in
|
|
|
|
the thread caches. The caches would also end up with much weaker protection
|
|
|
|
than the dedicated metadata region. Potentially worst of all, it's inherently
|
|
|
|
incompatible with the important quarantine feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary benefit from a thread cache is performing batches of allocations
|
|
|
|
and batches of deallocations to amortize the cost of the synchronization used
|
|
|
|
by locking. The issue is not contention but rather the cost of synchronization
|
|
|
|
itself. Performing operations in large batches isn't necessarily a good thing
|
|
|
|
in terms of reducing contention to improve scalability. Large thread caches
|
|
|
|
like TCMalloc are a legacy design choice and aren't a good approach for a
|
|
|
|
modern allocator. In jemalloc, thread caches are fairly small and have a form
|
|
|
|
of garbage collection to clear them out when they aren't being heavily used.
|
|
|
|
Since this is a hardened allocator with a bunch of small costs for the security
|
|
|
|
features, the synchronization is already a smaller percentage of the overall
|
|
|
|
time compared to a much leaner performance-oriented allocator. These benefits
|
|
|
|
could be obtained via allocation queues and deallocation queues which would
|
|
|
|
avoid bypassing the quarantine and wouldn't have as much of an impact on
|
|
|
|
randomization. However, deallocation queues would also interfere with having
|
|
|
|
global knowledge about what is free. An allocation queue alone wouldn't have
|
|
|
|
many drawbacks, but it isn't currently planned even as an optional feature
|
|
|
|
since it probably wouldn't be enabled by default and isn't worth the added
|
|
|
|
complexity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The secondary benefit of thread caches is being able to avoid the underlying
|
|
|
|
allocator implementation entirely for some allocations and deallocations when
|
|
|
|
they're mixed together rather than many allocations being done together or many
|
|
|
|
frees being done together. The value of this depends a lot on the application
|
|
|
|
and it's entirely unsuitable / incompatible with a hardened allocator since it
|
|
|
|
bypasses all of the underlying security and would destroy much of the security
|
|
|
|
value.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 02:29:14 +05:30
|
|
|
### Large allocations
|
2019-02-05 01:31:15 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expectation is that the allocator does not need to perform well for large
|
|
|
|
allocations, especially in terms of scalability. When the performance for large
|
|
|
|
allocations isn't good enough, the approach will be to enable more slab
|
|
|
|
allocation size classes. Doubling the maximum size of slab allocations only
|
|
|
|
requires adding 4 size classes while keeping internal waste bounded below 20%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large allocations are implemented as a wrapper on top of the kernel memory
|
|
|
|
mapping API. The addresses and sizes are tracked in a global data structure
|
|
|
|
with a global lock. The current implementation is a hash table and could easily
|
|
|
|
use fine-grained locking, but it would have little benefit since most of the
|
|
|
|
locking is in the kernel. Most of the contention will be on the `mmap_sem` lock
|
|
|
|
for the process in the kernel. Ideally, it could simply map memory when
|
|
|
|
allocating and unmap memory when freeing. However, this is a hardened allocator
|
|
|
|
and the security features require extra system calls due to lack of direct
|
|
|
|
support for this kind of hardening in the kernel. Randomly sized guard regions
|
|
|
|
are placed around each allocation which requires mapping a `PROT_NONE` region
|
|
|
|
including the guard regions and then unprotecting the usable area between them.
|
|
|
|
The quarantine implementation requires clobbering the mapping with a fresh
|
|
|
|
`PROT_NONE` mapping using `MAP_FIXED` on free to hold onto the region while
|
|
|
|
it's in the quarantine, until it's eventually unmapped when it's pushed out of
|
|
|
|
the quarantine. This means there are 2x as many system calls for allocating and
|
|
|
|
freeing as there would be if the kernel supported these features directly.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## Memory tagging
|
2019-02-04 22:21:20 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrating extensive support for ARMv8.5 memory tagging is planned and this
|
|
|
|
section will be expanded cover the details on the chosen design. The approach
|
|
|
|
for slab allocations is currently covered, but it can also be used for the
|
|
|
|
allocator metadata region and large allocations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memory allocations are already always multiples of naturally aligned 16 byte
|
|
|
|
units, so memory tags are a natural fit into a malloc implementation due to the
|
|
|
|
16 byte alignment requirement. The only extra memory consumption will come from
|
|
|
|
the hardware supported storage for the tag values (4 bits per 16 bytes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The baseline policy will be to generate random tags for each slab allocation
|
|
|
|
slot on first use. The highest value will be reserved for marking freed memory
|
|
|
|
allocations to detect any accesses to freed memory so it won't be part of the
|
|
|
|
generated range. Adjacent slots will be guaranteed to have distinct memory tags
|
|
|
|
in order to guarantee that linear overflows are detected. There are a few ways
|
|
|
|
of implementing this and it will end up depending on the performance costs of
|
|
|
|
different approaches. If there's an efficient way to fetch the adjacent tag
|
|
|
|
values without wasting extra memory, it will be possible to check for them and
|
|
|
|
skip them either by generating a new random value in a loop or incrementing
|
|
|
|
past them since the tiny bit of bias wouldn't matter. Another approach would be
|
|
|
|
alternating odd and even tag values but that would substantially reduce the
|
|
|
|
overall randomness of the tags and there's very little entropy from the start.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a slab allocation has been freed, the tag will be set to the reserved
|
|
|
|
value for free memory and the previous tag value will be stored inside the
|
|
|
|
allocation itself. The next time the slot is allocated, the chosen tag value
|
|
|
|
will be the previous value incremented by one to provide use-after-free
|
|
|
|
detection between generations of allocations. The stored tag will be wiped
|
|
|
|
before retagging the memory, to avoid leaking it and as part of preserving the
|
|
|
|
security property of newly allocated memory being zeroed due to zero-on-free.
|
|
|
|
It will eventually wrap all the way around, but this ends up providing a strong
|
|
|
|
guarantee for many allocation cycles due to the combination of 4 bit tags with
|
|
|
|
the FIFO quarantine feature providing delayed free. It also benefits from
|
|
|
|
random slot allocation and the randomized portion of delayed free, which result
|
|
|
|
in a further delay along with preventing a deterministic bypass by forcing a
|
|
|
|
reuse after a certain number of allocation cycles. Similarly to the initial tag
|
|
|
|
generation, tag values for adjacent allocations will be skipped by incrementing
|
|
|
|
past them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, consider this slab of allocations that are not yet used with 16
|
|
|
|
representing the tag for free memory. For the sake of simplicity, there will be
|
|
|
|
no quarantine or other slabs for this example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three slots are randomly chosen for allocations, with random tags assigned (2,
|
|
|
|
15, 7) since these slots haven't ever been used and don't have saved values:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 | 2 | 16 | 15 | 7 | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2nd allocation slot is freed, and is set back to the tag for free memory
|
|
|
|
(16), but with the previous tag value stored in the freed space:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first slot is allocated for the first time, receiving the random value 3:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2nd slot is randomly chosen again, so the previous tag (2) is retrieved and
|
|
|
|
incremented to 3 as part of the use-after-free mitigation. An adjacent
|
|
|
|
allocation already uses the tag 3, so the tag is further incremented to 4 (it
|
|
|
|
would be incremented to 5 if one of the adjacent tags was 4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The last slot is randomly chosen for the next alocation, and is assigned the
|
|
|
|
random value 15. However, it's placed next to an allocation with the tag 15 so
|
|
|
|
the tag is incremented and wraps around to 0:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-05 00:29:19 +05:30
|
|
|
## API extensions
|
2018-11-19 17:24:48 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `void free_sized(void *ptr, size_t expected_size)` function exposes the
|
|
|
|
sized deallocation sanity checks for C. A performance-oriented allocator could
|
|
|
|
use the same API as an optimization to avoid a potential cache miss from
|
|
|
|
reading the size from metadata.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `size_t malloc_object_size(void *ptr)` function returns an *upper bound* on
|
|
|
|
the accessible size of the relevant object (if any) by querying the malloc
|
|
|
|
implementation. It's similar to the `__builtin_object_size` intrinsic used by
|
|
|
|
`_FORTIFY_SOURCE` but via dynamically querying the malloc implementation rather
|
|
|
|
than determining constant sizes at compile-time. The current implementation is
|
|
|
|
just a naive placeholder returning much looser upper bounds than the intended
|
|
|
|
implementation. It's a valid implementation of the API already, but it will
|
|
|
|
become fully accurate once it's finished. This function is **not** currently
|
|
|
|
safe to call from signal handlers, but another API will be provided to make
|
|
|
|
that possible with a compile-time configuration option to avoid the necessary
|
|
|
|
overhead if the functionality isn't being used (in a way that doesn't change
|
|
|
|
break API compatibility based on the configuration).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `size_t malloc_object_size_fast(void *ptr)` is comparable, but avoids
|
|
|
|
expensive operations like locking or even atomics. It provides significantly
|
|
|
|
less useful results falling back to higher upper bounds, but is very fast. In
|
|
|
|
this implementation, it retrieves an upper bound on the size for small memory
|
|
|
|
allocations based on calculating the size class region. This function is safe
|
|
|
|
to use from signal handlers already.
|
2019-03-20 21:26:32 +05:30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## System calls
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is intended to aid with creating system call whitelists via seccomp-bpf
|
|
|
|
and will change over time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System calls used by all build configurations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `futex(uaddr, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, val, NULL)` (via `pthread_mutex_lock`)
|
|
|
|
* `futex(uaddr, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, val)` (via `pthread_mutex_unlock`)
|
|
|
|
* `getrandom(buf, buflen, 0)` (to seed and regularly reseed the CSPRNG)
|
|
|
|
* `mmap(NULL, size, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0)`
|
|
|
|
* `mmap(ptr, size, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED, -1, 0)`
|
|
|
|
* `mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ)`
|
|
|
|
* `mprotect(ptr, size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE)`
|
|
|
|
* `mremap(old, old_size, new_size, 0)`
|
|
|
|
* `mremap(old, old_size, new_size, MREMAP_MAYMOVE|MREMAP_FIXED, new)`
|
|
|
|
* `munmap`
|
|
|
|
* `write(STDERR_FILENO, buf, len)` (before aborting due to memory corruption)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional system calls when `CONFIG_SEAL_METADATA=true` is set:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `pkey_alloc`
|
|
|
|
* `pkey_mprotect` instead of `mprotect` with an additional `pkey` parameter,
|
|
|
|
but otherwise the same (regular `mprotect` is never called)
|
|
|
|
* `uname` (to detect old buggy kernel versions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional system calls for Android builds with `LABEL_MEMORY`:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `prctl(PR_SET_VMA, PR_SET_VMA_ANON_NAME, ptr, size, name)`
|